PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
Performance Appraisal is the entire exercise of assessment of an employee's performance on the job.
OBJECTIVES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
Performance Appraisal can be done with following objectives in mind:
- To maintain records in order to determine compensation packages, wage structure, salaries raises, etc.  
- To identify the strengths and weaknesses of employees to place right men on right job.
- To maintain and assess the potential present in a person for further growth and development.
- To provide a feedback to employees regarding their performance and related status.
- To provide a feedback to employees regarding their performance and related status.
- It serves as a basis for influencing working habits of the employees.
- To review and retain the promotional and other training programmes.  
ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
It is said that performance appraisal is an investment for the company which can be justified by following advantages:
- Promotion: Performance Appraisal helps the supervisors
 to chalk out the promotion programmes for efficient employees. In this 
regards, inefficient workers can be dismissed or demoted in case.
- Compensation: Performance Appraisal helps in 
chalking out compensation packages for employees. Merit rating is 
possible through performance appraisal. Performance Appraisal tries to 
give worth to a performance. Compensation packages which includes bonus,
 high salary rates, extra benefits, allowances and pre-requisites are 
dependent on performance appraisal. The criteria should be merit rather 
than seniority.
- Employees Development: The systematic procedure 
of performance appraisal helps the supervisors to frame training 
policies and programmes. It helps to analyse strengths and weaknesses of
 employees so that new jobs can be designed for efficient employees. It 
also helps in framing future development programmes.
- Selection Validation: Performance Appraisal helps
 the supervisors to understand the validity and importance of the 
selection procedure. The supervisors come to know the validity and 
thereby the strengths and weaknesses of selection procedure. Future 
changes in selection methods can be made in this regard.
- Communication: For an organization, effective 
communication between employees and employers is very important. Through
 performance appraisal, communication can be sought for in the following
 ways:
- Through performance appraisal, the employers can understand and accept skills of subordinates.
- The subordinates can also understand and create a trust and confidence in superiors.
- It also helps in maintaining cordial and congenial labour management relationship.
- It develops the spirit of work and boosts the morale of employees.
 All the above factors ensure effective communication.
- Motivation: Performance appraisal serves as a 
motivation tool. Through evaluating performance of employees, a person’s
 efficiency can be determined if the targets are achieved. This very 
well motivates a person for better job and helps him to improve his 
performance in the future. 
TECHNIQUES AND METHODS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: 
 
 
Numerous methods have been devised to measure the quantity and 
quality of performance appraisals. Each of the methods is effective for 
some purposes for some organizations only. None should be dismissed or 
accepted as appropriate except as they relate to the particular needs of
 the organization or an employee.
Broadly all methods of appraisals can be divided into two different categories.
Past Oriented Methods
1.    Rating Scales: Rating scales consists of 
several numerical scales representing job related performance criterions
 such as dependability, initiative, output, attendance, attitude etc. 
Each scales ranges from excellent to poor. The total numerical scores 
are computed and final conclusions are derived. Advantages – 
Adaptability, easy to use, low cost, every type of job can be evaluated,
 large number of employees covered, no formal training required. 
Disadvantages – Rater’s biases
2.    Checklist: Under this method, checklist of 
statements of traits of employee in the form of Yes or No based 
questions is prepared. Here the rater only does the reporting or 
checking and HR department does the actual evaluation. Advantages – 
economy, ease of administration, limited training required, 
standardization. Disadvantages – Raters biases, use of improper weighs 
by HR, does not allow rater to give relative ratings
3.    Forced Choice Method: The series of statements
 arranged in the blocks of two or more are given and the rater indicates
 which statement is true or false. The rater is forced to make a choice.
 HR department does actual assessment. Advantages – Absence of personal 
biases because of forced choice. Disadvantages – Statements may be 
wrongly framed.
4.    Forced Distribution Method: here employees are
 clustered around a high point on a rating scale. Rater is compelled to 
distribute the employees on all points on the scale. It is assumed that 
the performance is conformed to normal distribution. Advantages – 
Eliminates Disadvantages – Assumption of normal distribution, 
unrealistic, errors of central tendency.
5.    Critical Incidents Method: The approach is 
focused on certain critical behaviors of employee that makes all the 
difference in the performance. Supervisors as and when they occur record
 such incidents. Advantages – Evaluations are based on actual job 
behaviors, ratings are supported by descriptions, feedback is easy, 
reduces recency biases, chances of subordinate improvement are high. 
Disadvantages – Negative incidents can be prioritized, forgetting 
incidents, overly close supervision; feedback may be too much and may 
appear to be punishment.
6.    Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales: 
statements of effective and ineffective behaviors determine the points. 
They are said to be behaviorally anchored. The rater is supposed to say,
 which behavior describes the employee performance. Advantages – helps 
overcome rating errors. Disadvantages – Suffers from distortions 
inherent in most rating techniques.
7.    Field Review Method: This is an appraisal done
 by someone outside employees’ own department usually from corporate or 
HR department. Advantages – Useful for managerial level promotions, when
 comparable information is needed, Disadvantages – Outsider is generally
 not familiar with employees work environment, Observation of actual 
behaviors not possible.
8.    Performance Tests & Observations: This is 
based on the test of knowledge or skills. The tests may be written or an
 actual presentation of skills. Tests must be reliable and validated to 
be useful. Advantage – Tests may be apt to measure potential more than 
actual performance. Disadvantages – Tests may suffer if costs of test 
development or administration are high.
9.    Confidential Records: Mostly used by 
government departments, however its application in industry is not ruled
 out. Here the report is given in the form of Annual Confidentiality 
Report (ACR) and may record ratings with respect to following items; 
attendance, self expression, team work, leadership, initiative, 
technical ability, reasoning ability, originality and resourcefulness 
etc. The system is highly secretive and confidential. Feedback to the 
assessee is given only in case of an adverse entry. Disadvantage is that
 it is highly subjective and ratings can be manipulated because the 
evaluations are linked to HR actions like promotions etc.
10.  Essay Method: In this method the rater writes 
down the employee description in detail within a number of broad 
categories like, overall impression of performance, promoteability of 
employee, existing capabilities and qualifications of performing jobs, 
strengths and weaknesses and training needs of the employee. Advantage –
 It is extremely useful in filing information gaps about the employees 
that often occur in a better-structured checklist. Disadvantages – It 
its highly dependent upon the writing skills of rater and most of them 
are not good writers. They may get confused success depends on the 
memory power of raters.
11.  Cost Accounting Method: Here performance is 
evaluated from the monetary returns yields to his or her organization. 
Cost to keep employee, and benefit the organization derives is 
ascertained. Hence it is more dependent upon cost and benefit analysis.
12.  Comparative Evaluation Method (Ranking & Paired Comparisons): These
 are collection of different methods that compare performance with that 
of other co-workers. The usual techniques used may be ranking methods 
and paired comparison method.
- Ranking Methods: Superior ranks his worker based on
 merit, from best to worst. However how best and why best are not 
elaborated in this method. It is easy to administer and explanation.
- Paired Comparison Methods: In this method each 
employee is rated with another employee in the form of pairs. The number
 of comparisons may be calculated with the help of a formula as under.
N x (N-1) / 2
Future Oriented Methods 
 
 
1.    Management By Objectives: It means management 
by objectives and the performance is rated against the achievement of 
objectives stated by the management. MBO process goes as under.
- Establish goals and desired outcomes for each subordinate
- Setting performance standards
- Comparison of actual goals with goals attained by the employee
- Establish new goals and new strategies for goals not achieved in previous year.
Advantage – It is more useful for managerial positions.
Disadvantages – Not applicable to all jobs, allocation of merit pay 
may result in setting short-term 
goals rather than important and 
long-term goals etc.
2.    Psychological Appraisals: These appraisals are
 more directed to assess employees potential for future performance 
rather than the past one. It is done in the form of in-depth interviews,
 psychological tests, and discussion with supervisors and review of 
other evaluations. It is more focused on employees emotional, 
intellectual, and motivational and other personal characteristics 
affecting his performance. This approach is slow and costly and may be 
useful for bright young members who may have considerable potential. 
However quality of these appraisals largely depend upon the skills of 
psychologists who perform the evaluation.
3.    Assessment Centers: This technique was first 
developed in USA and UK in 1943. An assessment center is a central 
location where managers may come together to have their participation in
 job related exercises evaluated by trained observers. It is more 
focused on observation of behaviors across a series of select exercises 
or work samples. Assessees are requested to participate in in-basket 
exercises, work groups, computer simulations, role playing and other 
similar activities which require same attributes for successful 
performance in actual job. The characteristics assessed in assessment 
center can be assertiveness, persuasive ability, communicating ability, 
planning and organizational ability, self confidence, resistance to 
stress, energy level, decision making, sensitivity to feelings, 
administrative ability, creativity and mental alertness etc. 
Disadvantages – Costs of employees traveling and lodging, psychologists,
 ratings strongly influenced by assessee’s inter-personal skills. Solid 
performers may feel suffocated in simulated situations. Those who are 
not selected for this also may get affected.
Advantages – well-conducted assessment center can 
achieve better forecasts of future performance and progress than other 
methods of appraisals. Also reliability, content validity and predictive
 ability are said to be high in assessment centers. The tests also make 
sure that the wrong people are not hired or promoted. Finally it clearly
 defines the criteria for selection and promotion.
4.    360-Degree Feedback: It is a technique which 
is systematic collection of performance data on an individual group, 
derived from a number of stakeholders like immediate supervisors, team 
members, customers, peers and self. In fact anyone who has useful 
information on how an employee does a job may be one of the appraisers. 
This technique is highly useful in terms of broader perspective, greater
 self-development and multi-source feedback is useful. 360-degree 
appraisals are useful to measure inter-personal skills, customer 
satisfaction and team building skills. However on the negative side, 
receiving feedback from multiple sources can be intimidating, 
threatening etc. Multiple raters may be less adept at providing balanced
 and objective feedback.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN INDIA:
The performance of civil servants is commented upon by the controlling authority which normally is the head of the department. Incumbents are rated on several parameters like competence,punctuality,efficiency,capability,ability to work with the team,leadership qualities,etc. by means of Outstanding,very good,good or fair. 
A consistent outstanding grades is given special weight for promotions.
The assessing authority rates integrity as Totally beyond reproach, of unquestionable integrity,beyond doubt or as nothing adverse has come to notice.
More concentration is given to efficiency than Integrity in Public service performance appraisals in India which needs to be changed and equalised in order to ensure probity and root out corruption.
WEAKNESSES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN INDIA:
1. There is a high degree of subjectivity and is used as a means to make subordinates not ethical or efficient by the superiors but "subservient".
2. Employees especially if they are due for promotion have to run after the concerned reporting,reviewing and accepting authorities to ensure that their appraisal report is written on time.
3. Appraisal reports are never written on time causing great distress and demotivating to the employees.
4. Frequently transferred employees are denied a just and proper assessment for obvious reasons.
5. Desk work officials like the secretariat employees find it difficult to write meaningful reports of theirs due to lack of targets and achievements.
6. Only adverse remarks are communicated to employees and even then it is not done on time or not done at all in many departments.
7. Number of Annual Confidential Reports being reported or reviewed should be limited to span of control test lest it become a meaningless,routine activity.
8. A uniform format is used for ACRs regardless of the job performed by the employee and his nature of functions. There are wide variations in grading of civil servants between the states and the linking of empanelment of civil servants to ACRs has led to politicisation of the process. This should be revised and updated/changed accordingly.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED REFORMS FOR BETTER OBJECTIVITY OF APPRAISAL:
The Karnataka Administrative reforms Commission in its interim report in 2001 proposed the following:
1. Computerisation of all ACRs to ensure there are no missing reports or level jumping in the process.
2. Different formats for ACRs for Secretariats,field and public sector employees.
3. Confidentiality should be done away with and a full copy of the ACR should be provided to the 
employee so that he is motivated with his/her good points and works on his.her bad points.
4. As done in the armed forces and central police organisations, a grading system on a 10 or a 7 point scale to assess individual traits and attributes of the employee could be introduced as a necessary facet of the ACR exercise.
5. Proper training of objectivity should be given to all levels of officers who have to write ACRs.
6. Counseliing should be introduced for employees who get repeated adverse remarks.
7. Time frame to be decided for ACR submission/writing and Action to be taken against officers and Ministers delaying ACRs.
8. Comments in ACR to be used as inputs for training,job assignments and career development planning.