Monday, September 24, 2012

Urban Local Government: Municipal governance: main features, structures, finance and problem areas; 74th Constitutional Amendment; Global Local debate; New localism; Development dynamics, politics and administration with special reference to city management.



___________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________



URBAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT:

Municipal governance in India has been in existence since the year 1687 with the formation of Madras Municipal Corporation and then Calcutta and Bombay Municipal Corporation in 1726. In early part of the nineteenth century almost all towns in India had experienced some form of municipal governance. In 1882 the then Viceroy of India, Lord Ripon's resolution of local self-government laid the democratic forms of municipal governance in India.
In 1919, a Government of India act incorporated the need of the resolution and the powers of democratically elected government were formulated. In 1935 another Government of India act brought local government under the purview of the state or provincial government and specific powers were given.

For the Census of India 2011, the definition of urban area is as follows:
  1. All places with a municipality, corporation, cantonment board or notified town area committee, etc.
  2. All other places which satisfied the following criteria:
a) A minimum population of 5,000;
b) At least 75% of the male main working population engaged in non-agricultural pursuits; and
c) A density of population of at least 400 persons per sq. km.



 As a result of economic development in India, urbanization is proceeding at a very rapid rate. Cities and towns contribute to more than 60% of the GDP,so one can understand the strong co-relation between urbanization and economic development. So it is imperative to develop an efficient urban or municipal government.

Urban - Of or in a city or town.






MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE - MAIN FEATURES:

The purpose of municipal governance and strategic urban planning in a country is to create effective, responsive, democratic, transparent, accountable local governance framework organised according to a rational structure that promotes responsiveness and accountability; to provide responsive policy guidance and assistance to sub-national entities; to strengthen the legal, fiscal, economic and service delivery functions of municipalities; and to foster greater citizen participation in the governance of local bodies.

Similar to the Panchayati Raj system, the Nagar Palika Act or the Municipalities Act, 1992 set up through the 74th Amendment Act also provides for a three tier municipal system in the urban centres. The size and criteria of these municipal bodies are decided by the state legislature as it is set up under an Act of the state legislature.The Twelfth Schedule of Constitution (Article 243 w) provides an illustrative list of eighteen functions, that may be entrusted to the municipalities. Reservation of seats for ST,SC,OBC & women are similarly provided as is for the Panchayati Raj system. The Nagar Palikas/Municipals are to work as instruments of development and planning and also to handle funds for local activities.

Let's discuss them below:



STRUCTURE OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE OF A METROPOLIS:
i) Municipal Corporation - It is the topmost of urban local government and is for an urban area/centre with population above 3 lacs. As an institution it is more respectable and enjoys a greater measure of autonomy than other forms of local government.
It is set up under a special statute passed by the respective state's legislature. However, in an exception, in Delhi ( due to it being the National Capital Territory), the power to set up a Municipal Corporation lies with the Union Parliament.

ii) Councillors - Members of the Municipal Corporation are elected on the basis of universal adult suffrage for a period of five years and they are called Councillors.
These Councillors,collectively called the Municipal Council,exercise deliberative functions and the executive functions are performed by the Municipal Commissioner.

iii) Municipal Commissioner & Mayor - He is an Indian Administrative Services official appointed by the state government and has the executive powers of the government of Municipal Corporations. The other executives known as the Mayor and Deputy Mayor are political executives elected for a period of one year by the members of the Corporation. The Mayor is the titular head of the corporation and presides over the meetings of the corporation.

These Municipal Corporations are in charge of Wards ( subdivision or district of a town/city) according to its population and representatives are elected from each Ward. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai which is the civic body that governs Mumbai city is divided in to 6 zones each consisting of 3-5 wards each. Individual wards or collections of wards within a corporation sometimes have their own administrative body known as ward committees.

Functions of Municipal Corporations:
Obligatory -  Supply of wholesome water and construction and maintenance of water works, supply of electricity,road transport services,construction,maintenance,naming and numbering of public streets,lighting,watering and cleaning public streets,etc.

Discretionary - Construction of public parks, gardens,libraries,museums,theatres and stadiums,public housing,planting of trees on road sides and elsewhere,provision of relief to destitute and disabled persons,civil reception of VIPs,registration of marriages,organisation and management of fairs and exhibitions.


The Delhi Municipal Corporation was recently trifurcated citing better administration as the reason,in to North Delhi Municipal Corporation, South Delhi Municipal Corporation and the East Delhi Municpal Corporation.







STRUCTURE OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE IN SMALLER CITIES AND TOWNS - NAGAR PALIKA / MUNICIPALITY/MUNICIPAL COUNCIL:
Municipal Councils or Municipalities are set up for an urban area/centre with population of 100,000 or more, however there are exceptions to that as previously nagar palikas were constituted in urban centers with population over 20,000 so all the urban bodies which were previously classified as nagar palika were reclassified as nagar palika even if their population was under 100,000.

Members of the Nagar Palika are elected representatives for a period of five years. The town is further divided into Wards ( subdivision or district of a municipality/town) according to its population and representatives are elected from each ward. Wards may be grouped together into ward councils. One or more representatives are elected to represent each ward.The members elect a President among themselves to preside over and conduct meetings of the Municipality. A Chief Officer along with other officers like an Engineer,Sanitary Inspector,Health officer and education officer who come from the State Public service and are appointed by the state government to control the executive and administrative affairs of the Municipality.

The nagar palika is responsible for
  • Water supply
  • Hospitals
  • Roads
  • Street lighting
  • Drainage
  • Fire brigade
  • Market places and
  • Records of births and deaths
  • Solid waste management
Its sources of income are taxes on water, houses, markets, entertainment and vehicles paid by residents of the town and grants from the state government.







STRUCTURE OF MUNICIPAL GOVERNANCE IN VERY SMALL CITIES WHICH ARE IN A TRANSITION FROM RURAL TO URBAN - NAGAR PANCHAYAT:
Nagar Panchayats are for an urban area/centre having a population of more than 30,000 and less than 100,000 inhabitants.
However, there are some exceptions. All the previous town area committees (urban centres with a total population of more than 5,000 and less than 20,000) are reclassified as Nagar panchayat.

Nagar panchayats have a chairman with ward members. Membership consists of a minimum of ten elected ward members and three nominated members.And it consist of a Block Development Officer ( commonly known as Executive Officer) ,who is the chief of all administration.






SOME OTHER MUNICIPAL BODIES THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN NOTE OF:

NOTIFIED AREAS:
In urban planning, a Notified area is any land area earmarked by legal provision for future development. The term is used in the Hindi belt region of North India.
The term also describes a village or settlement with a population between 10,000 and 20,000. A community of over 20,000 is considered a town under Indian law. Each notified area elects a notified area committee for its administration where all members as well as the chairman are nominated by the state government, which function like municipality. There have been various recommendations asking to stop such centralisation in the state govt. hands by setting up these areas when they should actually be under the PRIs.

TOWN AREA COMMITTEE:
It is a semi municipal authority constituted for small towns,and it exists in several states out of which Uttar Pradesh has the largest number. The members may be partly elected and partly nominated by the state govt. or wholly nominated or wholly elected. It is assigned a number of functions like street lighting,drainage,roads,conservancy,etc. The District Collector in some states has been given powers of surveillance and control over the TAC. Following recommendations of the Rural Urban Relationship Committee,1966, that smaller TACs be merged with Panchayati Raj bodies,Madhya Pradesh and Haryana have done so.


SMALLER TOWN:
PSUs are set up by the govt. and housing colonies have been set up around them for the staff and workers. These draw people from rural as well as urban areas and this develops into a kind of a very small town,therefore it is named as smaller town. These are administered by the Municipal corporation or Municipality under which it falls which appoints a Town Administrator for this area who is assisted by a few engineers and technicians that handle functions like water,electricity,roads,drainage,markets,parks,etc. The expenditure on such are shared equally by the urban local govt. as well as the respective Industry.


CANTONMENT BOARD:
When a Military station is established in an area,military personnel move in and to provide them facilities for everyday life the civilian population move in like markets,colonies,etc. To administer such areas,the Cantonment boards were set up. There are 63 cantonment boards in India at the moment. These boards are centrally administered by the Defence Ministry. Board consists of elected and nominated members and the officer commanding the station is the President of the Board. An elected member holds office for three years whereas the nominated ones continue as long as they hold office in that station.

Other agencies/departments are the Pollution Control Board, Housing Boards,Water Supply and Sewage Boards,etc. which are statutory bodies set up under an act of the state government. They help ease the burden off the Municipal bodies as they contain specialists having expertise in the particular field.

Every state has its development authorities that are the Planning & Controlling Authority for all the urban areas and its members and chairman are appointed by the state government that governs and controls it,for example Delhi Development Authority (DDA) which is an exception as it is also centrally controlled due its sensitive position of being a National Capital Territory. The other states Development Authorities are controlled and governed by their respective state governments.







FINANCE OF MUNICIPAL BODIES:
Finances supplied to the Municipal bodies are determined and regulated by the respective state governments as per the 74th amendment act. Article 243x states that a state may by law authorise a Municipality to levy and collect property taxes,duties,tolls and fees. The state will lay down the procedure also for the same along with accounting methods.

Also as per the 74th Amendment act,the Indian Constitution has made it mandatory for every state to constitute a State Finance Commission to review the financial position of the Municipalities and make recommendations regarding distribution of taxes between the states and municipalities.It is also expected to look into the criteria for grants-in-aid and suggest measures needed to improve the financial position of the Municipalities.

Municipal Corporations Finance - (a) Non-tax Revenue : The non-tax revenue includes fees and fines, grants and contributions from the Government. Among its extraordinary sources may be listed loans, deposits,receipts on capital account, grants for capital works, etc.

(b) Tax Revenue : The major proportion of income of corporations flows from taxes. It
ranges from anything between two-fifths and three-fourths of total income. A corporation
generally has the power to levy the following taxes :
• Property tax
• Tax on vehicles and animals
• Theatre tax
• Tax on advertisements (other than newspapers)
• Profession tax
• Education tax
• Entertainment tax
• Tax on consumption and sale of electricity
• Betterment tax on increase in urban land values caused by the execution of any
development or improvement work.













Tax on deeds of transfer of immovable property is collected by the State Government and the amount collected within the area under the jurisdiction of a corporation is transferred to it.






PROBLEM AREAS OF MUNICIPAL BODIES:
i) Disqualifications of members of Municipal Bodies follow in principle the practice followed in state legislature disqualifications. But since it is governed by the state legislature who can make laws regarding the same,it is not consistent in all states and that leads to a lot of disparity and non - security among members.

ii) Election expenses and code of conduct to be better regulated and more powers should be given to the State election commission to do the same.

iii) The Municipal Councils/ Municipalities have restricted local autonomy as compared to the Municipal Corporations, with more pervasive state control that often climax in dissolution of the former.

iv) Lack of Finance due to reluctance of the state and central legislators not wanting to divest further taxation and grants powers to them more than what they already have for fear of loss of power. And the municipal bodies fear increasing tax or asking for new tax collection options for loss of popularity among people.

v) Local bodies are created by state governments and therefore can be dissolved by them as well if not dancing as per their tunes.

vi) Adding to the above is the drawing of rural people and other city people to a place where there is rapid urbanisation through industrialisation. Law and order becomes difficult,slums develop,etc. leading to multiplicity of problems for these already stressed out urban local governance bodies.

vii) In spite of many central and state committees sitting and recommending better financial and administrative autonomy for the Municipal bodies, there has been no concrete effort from the legislators side to implement the same.

viii) The power now seems to have shifted from the state governments to the financial institutions, international donors and credit rating agencies. Finally, the capacity of the government to generate employment directly through anti-poverty programmes would remain limited. The anti-poverty programmes should primarily be focused on provision of basic amenities.

ix) Lack of consistent and coherent urban development policy, faulty and improper urban planning, coupled with poor implementation and regulation overload in India’s cities.

x) No proper monitoring system in place.







74TH CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT:
It was enacted envisioning democratic decentralization and power to the people. Let's discuss it's important features:
i) It granted Constitutional status to local bodies and made them mandatory and laid down the procedure for their constitution.

ii) It provides for reservations in Municipalities at par with the PRIs

iii) Ensuring timely elections every five years, and incase of supersession,elections to be held before the expiration of six months from date of dissolution,and a proper report to be submitted by the state govt. for dissolving/superseding before the state legislature.

iv) Setting up of Finance Commission to review the financial position of the Municipalities and make recommendations regarding distribution of taxes between the states and municipalities.It is also expected to look into the criteria for grants-in-aid and suggest measures needed to improve the financial position of the Municipalities.

v) State Election Commission to ensure timely and fair conduct of elections.

vi) Setting up of District Planning Committees for Municipal Councils and Nagar panchayats to prepare draft development plan for the district as a whole and submit their draft development plan to the state govt. for review and inclusion in the state plan.

vii) Setting up of Metropolitan Planning Committee for Metropolis who would submit their draft development plan to the state govt. for review and inclusion in the state plan.







GLOBAL - LOCAL DEBATE:
Global - Local debate refers to an ongoing debate in regard to development at local levels that what should be its guiding principles - The ideas and objectives developed at the local levels or the technological urgencies that could be seen as leading the local level to global development?

Philosophers defending the idea of local attributes have favoured the arrangement of locally conceived arrangements and locally developed technology. According to this group, the very concept of local arrangement is based on the idea of immediateness and relevance. They believe that requirements fulfilled through local arrangements vary considerably from area to area. It has been argued that a uniform arrangement in the environment of huge diversity and valid clear-cut differences shall not be possible to achieve some uniform arrangement for all local regions. Local arrangements work on the principle of relevance where readiness amongst the people act as the vehicle for implementation. Under this arrangement as schemes developed locally gain high acceptance and is visible and little is lost as there is little resistance.
 It has been further argued that under this local arrangement local resources may be employed in a more meaningful way and much time and resources may not be wasted on training for implementation. Participation under the local arrangement shall be more as a feeling of empowerment and self decision making shall be present. The thinkers maintain that under such an arrangement quick identification shall be possible and more sensitive and responsive solution shall be possible.


On the other hand a group of thinkers pursuing the idea of a global arrangement, opine that in the absence of a global perspective,a local region shall become myopic in its vision and may witness a very slow rate of growth. Technological resource is a capital extensive area and also an expression of experiences,accidents,innovation,events of success and failures,etc that will help in adopting benchmarks and best practices in local development.
If any area shall try to keep itself closed to the experiences,innovations,etc of others it may risk a lot being in such limited boundaries and may never think beyond/out of the box than the ones prevailing in society.
According to the Global thinkers the world is emerging as a global village and showing an attitude of neglect towards this emerging trend shall be extremely risky and undesirable for local development.



CONCLUSION AND OBSERVATION OF THE GLOBAL - LOCAL DEBATE :
It has been observed that local arrangements operate better when social and technological readiness exists in regards to the factors of implementation. It has also been observed that development at the local level is promoted better in an environment of local arrangement but at the same time technological appreciation shall add to the purpose of the local authorities. It has been observed as well that technological import wherever seen useful shall be customised to meet the local requirements so as to have higher acceptance and minimize resistance to technological essentials.

A good example of this is NABARD which is a specialised and technologically updated body  for financial assistance for agricultural development.







NEW LOCALISM:
New Localism refers to an arrangement where urban local governance is seen provided with a uniform framework under an order of central government. New Localism evolved in the U.K in order to provide a uniform agenda and framework for local governance throughout the nation.
It was observed that in the absence of some uniform framework, the local governance institutions developed various disabilities and there was widespread inconsistency in regards to the functioning of such institutions. The Tony Blair govt. came out with a solution that was in the form of a framework in which the structure and functions of local self government institutions were specified under an order of the central govt. and they were to be instructed to operate as per the central govt. directives.
Some concerns have been raised in regards to the imperatives coming from the central govt. for the local govt. institutions and it has been observed that in such an arrangement decentralisation will be forced to the reverse and take a backseat leading to heavy centralisation thus defeating the very purpose of local self governance.

However, lets take a look at the good practices New Localism has infused in many countries,even though not implemented fully but definitely does give some food for thought and bettering the local self governance. It has been applied as a method of coordination between local governing institutions across a country. It has provided for more autonomy for foundation hospitals. It has provided for a structural framework where service providers in a local region coordinate with one another while executing their schemes. It has provided for a more comprehensive development at local areas as financial management has been become more active with better forged relations with the centre. It has provided for a better networking arrangement through the various agencies operational in a local area.








DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS IN URBAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT:
The scientific study of Development forces or processes (Dynamics) that produce movement/change inside a group or system.
The forces viz. developments in Urban Local Government:

i) Govt. Of India Acts of 1919 and 1935.

ii) 74th Amendment Act

iii) Increasing urbanisation(and this is going to only increase in future) as the structural transformation of the Indian economy matures,and as India moves to double-digit growth, the backlog, current and growth needs of urbanization need to be addressed comprehensively.

iv) Liberalisation,Privatisation and Globalisation.

v) Activeness of Foreign Institutions and organisations in the development of developing countries and the centrally and state sponsored schemes implementation at the local levels.

vi) Technological advances like e-governance,etc.

vii) Increasing participation of people through the works of NGOs and NPOs, Voluntary organisations and civil society.







POLITICS AND ADMINISTRATION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO CITY MANAGEMENT:
While urbanisation can be an engine of economic development and inclusion,unless managed properly,it can create serious socio-economic consequences and disastrous outcomes which would be difficult and impossible to fix.
Apart from the above mentioned Problem Areas of Municipal Bodies,with time,today's urban planners are busy creating a bureaucratic maze,issuing permits and enforcing planning and building codes,become reactive instead of proactive,corrective instead of pre-emptive.
We are busy implementing global plans at the local level but till date there is a majority of rural and urban dwellers who do not have access to even the basic amenities/services for a decent living.
One of the major causes of the abovementioned is the rigid bureaucratic approach towards this with a top-down approach that is a lethargic and unequipped and unskilled one. Recruits to head these urban Municipal bodies are generalists with little knowledge most of the times regarding the subject matter. Therefore, it is necessary for them to be equipped with the knowledge and management practices to build their capacities in order for them to efficiently and effectively handle the growing specific functions of these specific bodies and especially in this LPG era where India is undergoing an economic,social and political transformation.That is where City or Urban Management steps in.

Along with international organisations like World Bank,etc support the Government Of India has set up a host of programmes and courses for capacity building of urban governance officials and staff to achieve the abovementioned goals. An example:
 The Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI) and World Bank Institute (WBI) have entered in to partnership to specifically support capacity building needs of Indian cities and have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to this effect. Establishing Certification Program in Urban Management is a key initiative of the MOU. The Water and Sanitation Program, South Asia is a key partner in this initiative. The Certification Program has received the endorsement from Government of India’s Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD).

The Certification Program in Urban Management is designed to enhance the capacities of urban sector professionals who are appropriately trained and have demonstrated their competence to effectively take up challenging responsibilities in urban management. The program seeks to provide urban professionals with a vehicle through which they can gain the latest knowledge on key aspects of urban management, and to develop innovative solutions to confront major issues faced by Indian cities.

 Core Objectives


To provide a broader, more holistic perspective on the range of issues confronting Indian cities and to explore new approaches to address them;

To promote an active exchange of experiences and enhance awareness of national and international good practices for improving the accountability and creditworthiness of urban local governments and ensuring effective delivery of services, particularly to the urban poor;

To assist city managers and senior staff of urban local governments in developing appropriate management, governance, leadership and organizational tools and strategies to enable them to discharge their duties more effectively; and

To enhance the skills of urban sector professionals and enable them to formulate action plans to meet strategic goals of their institutions.




 Also refer to this article for the Gujarat state efforts recently - http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-04-26/vadodara/29474096_1_corporators-workshop-effective-town-planning







MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, GOVT. OF INDIA -
The Ministry of Urban Development is responsible for formulating policies, supporting and monitoring programmes and coordinating the activities of various Central Ministries, State Governments and other nodal authorities in so far as they relate to urban development issues in the country.

Its important Programmes/Schemes are:

i) Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission -
Objectives of the Mission
(1) The objectives of the JNNURM are to ensure that the following are achieved in the urban
sector;.
(a) Focused attention to integrated development of infrastructure services in cities covered under
the Mission;.
(b) Establishment of linkages between asset-creation and asset-management through a slew of
reforms for long-term project sustainability;.
(c) Ensuring adequate funds to meet the deficiencies in urban infrastructural services;.
(d) Planned development of identified cities including peri-urban areas, outgrowths and urban
corridors leading to dispersed urbanisation;.
(e) Scale-up delivery of civic amenities and provision of utilities with emphasis on universal
access to the urban poor;.
(f ) Special focus on urban renewal programme for the old city areas to reduce congestion; and
(g) Provision of basic services to the urban poor including security of tenure at affordable prices,
improved housing, water supply and sanitation, and ensuring delivery of other existing universal
services of the government for education, health and social security.




ii) Urban Infrastructure Development Scheme for Small & Medium Towns (UIDSSMT) - This subsumed the existing schemes of Integrated Development of Small and Medium Towns (IDSMT) and Accelerated Urban Water Supply Programme (AUWSP). The objectives of the Scheme are:
1. Improve infrastructural facilities and help create durable public assets and quality oriented services in cities & towns, Enhance public-private-partnership in infrastructural development and Promote planned integrated development of towns and cities.
All towns/cities as per 2001 census except 63 Mission cities/Urban Agglomeration covered under JNNURM are eligible to be covered under the scheme. The components for assistance under the Scheme include all urban infrastructure development projects such as water supply, roads, parking space, drainage, solid waste management, sewerage, urban renewal, preservation of water bodies and prevention of soil erosion.


iii) ADB Funded North Eastern Region Urban Development Programme (NERUDP) - The North Eastern Region Urban Development Programme (NERUDP) Phase-I is being implemented by the Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) with the financial assistance from Asian Development Bank (ADB). It covers capital cities of 5 North Eastern States viz. Agartala (Tripura), Aizawl (Mizoram), Gangtok (Sikkim), and Kohima (Nagaland). The project covers priority urban services viz.
 (i) Water Supply,
(ii) Sewerage and Sanitation, and
(iii) Solid Waste Management.
In addition, Project Management and Capacity Development of the ULBs through institutional and financial reforms have also been included so that the ULBs become capable of planning and implementing infrastructure projects.

Refer to the Ministry's official website - http://www.urbanindia.nic.in/

___________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________



The next post on this blog will cover:

Law and Order Administration:
British legacy; National Police Commission;
Investigative agencies; Role of central and
state agencies including paramilitary forces
in maintenance of law and order and countering
insurgency and terrorism; Criminalisation
of politics and administration; Police-
public relations; Reforms in Police.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Rural Development: Institutions and agencies since independence; Rural development programmes: foci and strategies; Decentralization and Panchayati Raj; 73rd Constitutional amendment.


___________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________


RURAL DEVELOPMENT:

" India lives in its villages " ~~~ Mahatma Gandhi

India is a country of villages with 70% of India's population live in rural areas as per Census of India's 2011 Provisional Population Totals of Rural-Urban Distribution. And,a large majority of those villages have very poor socio - economic conditions. Therefore, one can understand the importance of developing the rural areas. A slowdown in rural growth/development rate leads to a slow down the national growth rate as well even if the urban growth remain remains the same or increases, refer -
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/70-indians-live-in-rural-areas-census/141379/on

The concerted efforts made to ameliorate the standard of living of the people of the villages is what is termed as Rural Development. And it is achieved through collective governmental and voluntary agencies' efforts in a country

Rural - Is an area where the people are engaged in primary industry in the sense that they produce things directly for the first time in cooperation with nature. People here live in villages,farms or isolated homes in remote areas. Agriculture is the main occupation of rural areas, others can be based on mining,oil and gas exploration,tourism, logging,etc.






RURAL DEVELOPMENT - HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE:
Villages and rural development have always been a part of India since time immemorial and they used to be self sufficient and self sustained resembling small republics and the respective rulers used to pitch in efforts to better them.

However, the present structure and style of functioning of local self governments is a British structure.  A beginning of local government is said to have been made in the year 1687 when for the first time, a local governing body - Municipal corporation was formed in Madras.

The British were concerned with finances/revenue collection/not political, and they knew that they had to have their hands into the local governments to reach the grass roots for top to bottom control. This led to severe exploitation of the rural areas by the British for their vested interests and a big blow to the economy. The recurrent famines in the later part of the 19th century and the recommendations of the Famine Commission Lord Mayo's resolution regarding local government was passed where the majority of officials were to be nominated by the British govt.

Lord Ripon's Resolution of 1882 or Local self government set the political tone of local government self government in India. The members were to be elected locally.
2/3rd members to be elected and chaired by non official of the British govt. This was seen with contempt and suspicion by the British bureaucracy and stiff resistance was put up by them.  This proposal was barely implemented and in late 19th century it was withdrawn. In the 1906 session of Congress this concept was brought up again for debate and some initiatives regarding the same were taken by the ruling govt. with the initiative of Lord Curzon, Provincial Department of
Agriculture with Agricultural College and Provincial Research Institute were
established. in 1906 the Indian Agricultural Service was constituted.This was further carried on to the Government of India Act of 1919 (Provision of Abject in Transferred List) and followed by the Government Act 1935 as well with some changes to suit the current scenario.

During the Independence struggle and infact throughout it, the national leaders advocated village communities. The Gandhian view prevailed and Panchayates became the foundation of the local self government. This principle is enshrined in Article 40 of the Indian Constitution under the Directive Principles Of State Policy that lays down that the State shall take steps to organise village Panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self - government.

A large number of rural development programmes were started by the Nationalists and Social reformers out of which some gradually diminished due to various technical/administrative reasons and some merged with the Govt. sponsored schemes later.

For details these pre - independence schemes refer to - http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/307/9/09_chapter2

All these programmes,irrespective of their failures/successes, were and are instrumental in setting the tone for rural welfare and development while framing the constitution, as well as a guiding force and examples for today's people and administrators of rural development.








INSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES SINCE INDEPENDENCE:

The Ministry of Rural Development in India is the apex body for policy formulation,regulations and acts pertaining to the development of the rural sector,agriculture,handicrafts,fisheries,poultry,and dairy are the primary contributors to the rural business and economy.

 Refer to the Ministry's official website as well - http://rural.nic.in/sites/about-the-ministry.asp



There are two departments under the Ministry :
i) Department of Land Resources - The main objectives of the Department are:
  • To increase productivity of rainfed/degraded land through the process of integrated watershed management.

  • To support the States/UTs for implementation of National Land Records Modernization Programme (NLRMP)

  • Land reforms and other related matters relating to land like administration of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, National Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy of 2007 , Registration Act, 1908 etc.

  • Bio-diesel Mission
Refer : http://dolr.nic.in/





ii) Department of Rural Development - Department of Rural Development in India is a department under the Ministry of Rural Development in the Central Government of India. The Department facilitates the provision of several services such as training and research facilities, human resource development, institutes of Panchayati Raj, and at the same time provides functional assistance to the DRDA and oversees the execution of projects and schemes.

Department of Rural Development also executes the schemes for wage employment and self-employment generation and, for providing small irrigation and housing facilities to the rural poor, provide economic aid to the poor in rural areas, basic minimum services. The department also develops roads in the rural areas.

The Department of Rural Development in India functions according to the formulated schemes.

Refer to the url - http://drd.nic.in/DRD/aboutus.asp





B) RURAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION

The function of the Rural Development Division is primarily to provide overall policy guidance in formulation of plans and programmes for Rural Development. This is the nodal Division for matters relating to poverty eradication, employment generation in rural areas, development of watershed & degraded land. The following specific activities are undertaken by Division;
  1. To assist in formulation of rural development programmes to be included in Five Year Plans and Annual Plans and to make periodic assessment of progress achieved.
  2. To analyse and prepare comments on the EFC Memoranda and Cabinet Notes paper for Group of Ministers pertaining to rural development programmes.
  3. To maintain liaison with Ministry of Rural Development, National Institute of Rural Development (NIRD) and other allied organisations mainly and participating in the meetings.
  4. To collect information from various Divisions of the Planning Commission, State Governments and also from the Central Ministries which are implementing various schemes related to rural development.
  5. To organize Working Group meetings to finalise the Draft Five Year Plan proposals of the State Governments. This involves the preparation of background papers, discussions on inter-se plan priorities, critical examination of plan proposals in relation to plan objectives and approaches, preparation of Working Group Reports giving, inter-alia, outlays and physical targets.
  6. Finalisation of the Five Year Plan outlays of the Ministry of Rural Development. Finalisation of Annual Plans of the Central Ministry of Rural Development and State Governments. This includes assessment of progress both in physical and financial terms, in relation to the approved targets and outlays, scheme-wise examination of proposals and reviewing targets and finalizing allocation for next Annual Plan.
  7. To provide comments, materials etc. for Public representations, VIP references, Parliament Questions and Agenda items for the meetings of Consultative Committee/ Standing Committee for the Planning Commission pertaining to rural development sector are also attended to.



I) DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES (DRDA):
The above mentioned programmes of the Ministry Of Rural Development viz. anti - poverty,wage employment,rural housing,etc. are implemented and supervised by the District Rural Development Agencies ( DRDA) registered under the Societies Registration Act,1860,in the districts in the respective states. Substantial sums of rural development funds of government of India were transferred and routed through them under various Centrally Sponsored Schemes. From purely a financial resource from Rural Development point of view the DRDAs are extremely important institutions at the district level.


Both district level officials and public representative like M.P. , MLA ,Panchayat Samiti Chairpersons etc are the member of the Society. President, Zilla Parisad is the Ex-Officio Chairman of DRDA. All administrative and financial power are vested on Collector. The Project Director of the Agency looks after day to day administration. DRDA releases funds under various anti poverty programmes under Ministry of Rural Development,govt. of India and State Govt.   to various banks / executing agencies. It monitors the implementation of schemes, utilization of fund very closely. Following important schemes are implemented through DRDA.
There have been debates over merging of the DRDAs and the respective Panchayats as a part of decentralisation since DRDA is a centralised body and if true decentralisation is to be achieved then it should be given in charge of the respective local self governments. However, this complete merger has said to have happened in only two states that is Kerala and Karnataka who have a history of empowering the grassroots. Here, the DRDAs function as a unit of the Zilla Panchayat as cells of poverty alleviation / rural development schemes.

In 10 States/ UTs the DRDAs continue to be separate with the only linkage established with the ZPs is making the President of ZP the Chairperson of the DRDA. These are Bihar, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Punjab, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Lakshadweep. In Gujarat the District Development Officer, who is also the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Panchayat, continues to chair the DRDA. In nine States/ UTs either the Collector continues as the Chair or some other arrangement has been made in this regard. These are Assam, Goa, Haryana, Jharkhand, Manipur, Tamil Nadu, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu, and Pondicherry. Andhra Pradesh has made the Zilla Panchayat President the Chair of the DRDA while designating the Collector as the Executive Chairperson. Similarly, in Maharashtra, while the President Zilla Panchayat is made the Chair of the DRDA, the Chief Executive Officer of the Zilla Panchayat is designated as the Executive Chairman of the Management Committee.

Refer - http://rural.nic.in/sites/downloads/programmes-schemes/DRDA_Guidelines.pdf


Table : Status of DRDAs in the States
Sl. NoState or U.TStatus of DRDA
1Andhra PradeshDRDAs are separate; Collector is the Executive Chairperson though ZP President is made the Chairperson; large number and scope of parallel bodies across layers
2Arunachal PradeshDRDAs are separate
3AssamDRDA separate; Collector is Chair and Ex Director; many parallel bodies
4BiharDRDA separate; ZP Chairman is Chairman of DRDA; many other parallel bodies;
5ChattisgarhReportedly DRDA merged; practically only the ZP Chairman is made the Chairman of DRDA;
6GoaDRDAs are separate;
7GujaratDRDA separate; District Development Officer is the Chairman;
8HaryanaDRDAs separate; Dy Commissioner/ Collector is the Chairman
9Himachal PradeshDRDAs separate; ZP chairman is the chairman of DRDA; there are many other parallel bodies
10Jammu & KashmirDRDAs separate; interestingly, the DRDA administration is being refurbished, which by itself could be a very positive step; Panchayat at district level is called the District Planning & Development Board – in a way combining the ZP and DPC
11JharkhandDRDAs separate; Dy Commissioner is Chairperson of DRDA
12KarnatakaDRDA merged with ZP since 1987; functions as a unit of ZP office with distinctiveness maintained only to facilitate transactions with the MoRD, New Delhi
13KeralaDRDAs merged with ZP, function as poverty alleviation cell of the ZP; some parallel bodies (Freshwater Fish Development Agency, Brackishwater Fish Development Agency) still function as per the directions of GoI. The MLA-LDF is also outside the purview and is sort of a parallel body.
14Madhya PradeshDRDAs separate; ZP Chairman is the Chairman of DRDA Many parallel bodies, particularly those funded by multilateral and bilateral agencies and operated by the State Government as para-statal entities; DPIP andMPRLP are two examples.
15MaharashtraDRDA separate, ZP Chairman has a cosmetic position of being Chairman of Governing Body of DRDA with the CEO being the executive chairman of the Management Committee
16ManipurDRDA separate; Dy Commissioner as the Head; Many parallel bodies primarily associated with the Development programmes/ schemes of the Union Government.
17OrissaDRDA separate; PD – DRDA is designated as the Secretary-cum- Executive officer of ZP; ZP President is the Chair of DRDA
18PunjabDRDAs separate; ZP Chairman is made the Chairman and it is said that all Panchayats have access to the expertise of DRDA; there are other parallel bodies at district and village levels (Village Water and SanitationCommittees, Village Education Committees), with no linkage with Panchayats
19RajasthanDRDA reportedly merged in 2003; however there are para-statals set up through multilateral funding as well as schemes of State and Union government
20SikkimDRDA is separate
21Tamil NaduDRDA separate institution; Chaired by the District Collector; many parallel bodies like in village education committee, watershed Associations, village forests committees exists.
22TripuraDRDA exists separately; President of ZP is the Chairman of DRDA
23Uttar PradeshDRDAs separate; headed by ZP President; there are a few other parallel bodies
24UttarakhandDRDA separate; ZP President is its chair; Van Panchayats, Village Education Committees are the other parallel bodies
25West BengalDRDA merged; rechristened as DRDC of ZP;
26Andaman & NicobarDRDA is separate; Out of three, only one ZP President is the Chair ofDRDA;
27ChandigarhNo DRDA
28Dadra & Nagar HaveliDRDA is separate
29Daman & DiuDRDA continues to function as a separate body and have not been merged.
30LakshadweepDRDA is said to be merged; ZP President is the Chair; DRDA providing support to the ZP; other parallel bodies relate to Central schemes such at the SSA;
31PondicherryDRDA is separate; Attempts are made to link other parallel bodies with Panchayats;







II) NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT ( NABARD ):

 NABARD was established on the recommendations of Shivaraman Committee, by an act of Parliament on 12 July 1982 to implement the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Act 1981. It replaced the Agricultural Credit Department (ACD) and Rural Planning and Credit Cell (RPCC) of Reserve Bank of India, and Agricultural Refinance and Development Corporation (ARDC). It is one of the premiere agencies to provide credit in rural areas. The govt. holds 99% stake in NABARD since RBI sold its share to the GOI.

Objectives of National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development are -
  • The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development would be the apex body pertaining to the planning of the financial and functional aspects of promotion for small-scale industries, agriculture, handicrafts, rural crafts, village industries, cottage industries, and any kind of commercial operations in the rural sector.
  • The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development would function as a refinancing organization for the credit given by financial agencies both long term loans and short term loans for promoting various kinds of activities in the rural sector.

  • The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development would facilitate the provision of direct loan to different institutions on the approval of the Central Government of India.
  • The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development would have constitutional connections with the apex bank, the Reserve Bank of India.





III) HARYANA STATE COOPERATIVE APEX BANK LIMITED:
HARCOBANK is the apex organisations for rural development in the state of Haryana and its purpose is to financially assist the artisans in the rural areas,farmers and the agrarian unskilled labour,small and big rural entrepreneurs of Haryana by functioning as an investor since three decades now. Its reach is across the length and breadth of Haryana through its numerous branches and associate partners.
Agrarian credits under HARCOBANK are-
  • Loans schemes
  • Interim finance by the means of cash loans
  • Cash Credit against mortgage of property
  • Crop Loan and Kisan Credit Card
Loan schemes under non-farm finance of HARCOBANK

  • Loans against mortgage of jewelry and gold ornaments
  • Loans to the students engaging in professional degree courses such as medicine, engineering, management, etc. based on the repayment capability of the applicant of the loan
  • Loans for the purchase of taxi-cars, auto rickshaw, light commercial vehicles, motor buses, trucks, and others those who fall under the category of small transport operators
  • Cash loan facility to traders and businessmen against mortgage of collateral or stock hypothecation trade
  • Scheme for buying consumer durables
  • Short time overdraft facility to people based on the credit report or presenting collateral securities, etc.
  • Composite loan scheme
  • Advances against national savings certificate (NSC)
  • Farm sector activities
  • Small transport operators, water, and road scheme
  • Integrated loan scheme
Banking deposit schemes under HARCOBANK -

  • Fixed Deposit
  • Recurring Deposits
  • Money Multiple Certificate (MMC)
  • Re-investment Term Deposit (RITD)
  • Combined Recurring Deposits and Provident Funds for different institutions
Staff Loan facilities under HARCOBANK -

  • House Building Loan for construction, repair, extension of house property
  • Conveyance Loan for vehicles for cars, scooters, motorcycles
  • Computer Loans for household purpose of the employees
According to its financial position and its total performance at the domestic level, the National Federation of State Cooperative Banks (NAFSCOB) and National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) have awarded the Haryana State Cooperative Apex Bank Limited.

HARCOBANK-Awards

  • Special award for Recovery and Profitability in 1998-99
  • Special Award in Profitability for 1999-2000
  • Special Award in Outreach, Recovery Performance and Profitability for 2000-01
  • Special Award in performance for 2001-02
  • Second-Overall Performance for 2002-03








IV) REGIONAL RURAL BANKS:
The main goal of establishing regional rural banks in India(1975 via the Narsimhan Committee report) was to provide credit to the rural people who are not economically strong enough, especially the small and marginal farmers, artisans, agricultural labours, and even small entrepreneurs. But there have been many issues regarding its financial viability numerous analysis and studies have been taking place to study the same.

Refer for list of the Regional Rural Banks In India:
http://time4education.com/bankexams/List_of_RRBs.aspx








V) VARIOUS MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS,NGOs & FOUNDATIONS:
 Microfinance institutions provide financial assistance to micro-entrepreneurs and small businesses where there is a lack of banking and related services due to high transaction costs associated while serving these client categories. They provide these financial services through relationship - based banking for individual entrepreneurs and small businesses; and group based models where several entrepreneurs come together to apply for loans and other services as a group.

These Microfinances are also assited by the NABARD. And to recognise their pivotal efforts, the GOI has recently passed the Microfinance Services Regulation Bill. Refer to article - http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Cabinet-clears-Micro-Finance-Bill-RBI-to-regulate-MFIs/articleshow/13084668.cms    &     http://www.livemint.com/Politics/3Cy3bTQY2r4J7YuC6EpQqL/Finance-ministry-clears-proposed-national-microfinance-law.html

http://www.nabard.org/pdf/report_financial/chap_viii.pdf

For list of Microfinance Institutions: http://indiamicrofinance.com/top-50-microfinance-institutions-india.html


AVARD is Association of Voluntary Agencies for rural development - refer http://www.avard.in/

Also a mention should be made of the Aga Khan Rural Development Network which is a voluntary foundation doing exemplary work in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Gujarat.

Refer -http://www.akdn.org/rural_development/india.asp










RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES - FOCI AND STRATEGIES:

Rural Development Programmes or Bharat Nirman Plan of the GOI comprise of the following:
i) Provision of basic infrastructure facilities in the rural areas like schools,health facilities,roads,drinking water,electrification,etc.

ii) Improving agricultural productivity in the rural areas.

iii) Provision of social services like health and education for socio - economic development.

iv) Implementing schemes for the promotion of rural industry increasing agricultural productivity, providing rural employment,etc.

v) Assistance to individual families and Self Help Groups living below poverty line by providing productive resources through credit and subsidy.

Refer - http://www.india.gov.in/sectors/rural/index.php?id=1 & http://www.bharatnirman.gov.in/welcome.html



Lets discuss them:
1) Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana - A fully funded Centrally Sponsored Scheme to provide all
weather road connectivity in rural areas of the country. The programme
envisages connecting all habitations with a population of 500 persons and
above in the plain areas and 250 persons and above in hill States, the tribal
and the desert areas.


2) Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana - SGSY is a major on-going scheme for the self-employment of the rural poor. The basic objective of the scheme is to bring the assisted poor families (swarozgaris) above the poverty line by providing them income generating assets through a mix of bank credit and government subsidy. Credit is the critical component of the scheme whereas the subsidy is an enabling element. The scheme involves organisation of the poor into Self Help Groups (SHGs) build their capacities through a process of social mobilization, their training, selection of key activities, planning of activity clusters, creation of infrastructure, provision of technology and marketing support, etc. Under the scheme focus is on the group approach. However, individual Swarozgaris are also assisted. The SGSY is being implemented by the District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs) with the active involvement of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), banks, line Departments and the Non-Government Organisations (NGOs).
The credit mobilization under SGSY has been abysmally low. Further, a large number of SHGs are formed but fizzle out midway after availing the revolving fund. To make the scheme more effective it is being re-structured with a sharper focus on poorest of the poor people. A suitable mechanism will be put in place for higher social mobilization, capacity building and institution building among the target population

3) Rural Housing (Indira Awas Yojana) - The IAY is being implemented as an independent scheme since 1996. It aims to provide assistance for construction / up gradation of dwelling units to the Below Poverty Line (BPL) rural households, with special emphasis on SCs, STs and freed bonded labor categories. A maximum assistance of Rs 35,000 per unit is provided for construction in plain areas and Rs 38,500 per unit for hilly/difficult areas. Rs 15000 is given for up gradation of a dwelling unit for all areas. The funding of IAY is shared between the Centre and State in the ratio of 75:25. (100% in the case of UTs).

4) MGNREGA - The primary objective of the scheme is to provide guaranteed work for 100 days for any household wishing to have such employment. Although all households are eligible, the expectation is that only the poorer sections, i.e., landless labour and marginal farmers would actually seek work. The secondary objective is to ensure that employment generated is from works that raise land productivity.


5) National Social Assistance Programme - The National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) was launched with the aim to provide social assistance benefit to poor households in the case of old age, death of primary breadwinner and maternity. The programme supplements the efforts of the State Governments with the objective of ensuring minimum national levels of well being and the Central assistance is an addition to the benefit that the States are already providing on Social Protection Schemes. With a view to ensure better linkage with nutrition and national population control programmes, the Maternity Benefit Component of the NSAP was transferred to the Department of Family Welfare, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare with effect from 2001-02. The schemes of NSAP and Annapurna have been transferred to the State Plan with effect from 2002-03 with a view to provide requisite flexibility to the State / UT in the choice and implementation of the schemes.


6) Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) - During the Eleventh Plan, the three area development programmes, namely, Integrated Wasteland Development Programme, Drought Prone Area Programme and Desert Development Programme have been integrated and consolidated into a single programme called Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP). This consolidation is for optimum use of resources, sustainable outcomes an integrated planning. The common guidelines for the Watershed Development Programme have been formulated and are effective from 1.4.2008. An amount of Rs.1825 crore has been allocated for IWMP during 2008-09. The ongoing projects sanctioned prior to 1.4.2008 under DADP, DDP, and IWDP would be continued to be implemented as per old guidelines.
The modified IWMP would adopt a three tier approach in which the upper reaches which are mainly forested and hilly would be treated with the support of Forest Department. For land situated intermediate slopes above the agriculture lands, the IWMP would address all the necessary issues of land treatment by adopting best possible options including cropping pattern, horticulture and agro-forestry etc. In the lower tire, which are plains and mainly agricultural lands, the IWMP would be dovetailed with the employment generating programme such as National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS) an would fill the critical gaps of NREGS and vice versa.
Under the new programme, a cluster approach would be followed with a broader vision of natural hydro-geographical unit of average size of 4,000 to 10,000 ha. comprising of clusters of micro-watershed to be selected as project area. The programme would be implemented by dedicated institutional agencies at state and central level. Professional support (in the form of multidisciplinary expert team) would be provided to support these institutions with proper fund allocation. A core GIS facility with spatial and non-spatial data augmented with satellite imagery data would be set up for giving Controlled access/distribution for local project planning.
The project period is proposed in the range of 5 to 7 years in three distinct phases, i.e. Preparatory, Watershed works and Consolidation phase. The consolidation phase will include livelihood activities, marketing, processing and value addition activities.
7) National Land Records Modernization Programme (NLRMP): The National Land Records Modernization Programme (NLRMP) has been conceptualized as a major system and reform initiative that is concerned not merely with computerization, updating and maintenance of land records and validation of titles, but also as a programme that will add value and provide a comprehensive database for planning developmental, regulatory and disaster management activities by providing location-specific information, while providing citizen services based on land records data.
Under the NLRMP, the following three layers of data will be integrated on a geographic information system (GIS) platform: Spatial data from satellite imagery/aerial photography, Survey of India and Forest Survey of India maps, and Revenue records: cadastral maps and RoR details. All cadastral maps will be digitized, and data included with plot numbers and unique id for each land parcel. Administrative unit boundaries from village level upwards (including panchayat, block, tehsil, circle, sub-division, district, division, State and national boundaries), forest, water bodies and other physical attributes of land and land use details will be overlaid, and other developmental layers (e.g., watersheds, road networks, etc.) added to the core GIS.
The activities to be supported under the Programme, inter alia, include survey/resurvey using modern technology including aerial photogrammetry, updating of land records including mutation records, completion of computerization of the records of rights (RoRs), computerization of registration, automatic generation of mutation notices, digitization of maps , integration of the entire system digitization of maps and training and capacity building of the concerned officials and functionaries. Connectivity amongst the land records and registration offices and land records management centers at tehsil/taluk/circle/block level would be supported. Access to land records data would be provided to Cooperative and other financial institutions for facilitating credit operations.
A major focus of the Programme will be on citizen services, such as providing records of rights (RoRs) with maps; other land-based certificates such as caste certificates, income certificates (particularly in rural areas), domicile certificates; information for eligibility for development programmes; land passbooks, etc.
In addition, the Programme will be of immense usefulness to the governments - both Central and State Governments - in modernizing and bringing efficiency to the land revenue administration as well as offering a comprehensive tool for planning various land-based developmental, regulatory and disaster management activities needing location-specific information. Even the private sector will be able to benefit from this comprehensive tool for planning business and economic activities.
For the above mentioned and other important programmes presently being implemented by the Ministry of Rural Development, refer and click on the respective links for detailed information:  http://rural.nic.in/sites/programmes-schemes.asp










DECENTRALIZATION AND PANCHAYATI RAJ:
For a vibrant and dynamic local self government Political Decentralization is a major advantage as then programming becomes more realistic and local problems receive immediate and urgent attention and the decision makers are more effectively accountable as local vigilance also increases thus reducing corruption.
Towards this goal, and keeping Gandhi ji's Sarvodaya (upliftment and progress of all) principle in mind,the GOI on 2nd October 1952(Gandhi Jayanti) launched a programme through which an all round development of the population ( rural) was sought that was termed as the Community Development Programme as a part of the first Five Year Plan alongwith a booster programme called the National Extension Services at the Block level headed by the Block Development Officer,however its implementation disclosed a distinct lack of citizen interest. Therefore, the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee to study and diagnose the same was set up and it brought forward the reason for this disinterest which was a dearth of avenues of popular participation in local level development programmes for the public/people.

The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee suggested the following as corrective measures in 1957:
i) A three tier Panchayati Raj structure to be established wherein the uppermost tier will be the Zilla Parishad ( District), while the lowermost tier shall be the Gram Panchayat ( Village level) and the intermediate tier was to be the Panchayat Samiti ( Block/ Taluk level).
ii) District Colector was to be the Chairperson of the Zilla Parishad and had an advisory and coordinating role.
iii) Panchayat Samiti to be entrusted with the executive powers.
iv) Direct elections to level of Gram Panchayat and higher level appointments to be made through nominations and other indirect means.
v) The Panchayat Samiti to have the headmen or sarpanch of the gram panchayat as its members while the Zilla Parishad shall be a body consisting of ex-officio members and headmen of the Panchayat Samiti.
vi) District or Zilla Parishad was seen as a unit for achieving democratic decentralisation and it was recommended as the unit for planning and organising as well as supervising district administrative functions.

This was implemented but some states were not in favour of giving such far reaching executive powers to the Panchayat Samiti ( Block level) and instead rooted for the District/Zilla Parishad as the executive body as it is alone capable of providing the requisite resources, administrative and technical personnel and equipment required for properly coordinated development. This was suported by the G.V.K Rao Committee as well that was setup to study the implementation of the abovementioned three tier structure. Maharashtra and Gujarat and Karnataka have adopted this model where the district is the executive body,in other states the Panchayat Samiti remains the executive body.

However, after the initial support and setting up of the Panchayati Raj in the villages, it suddenly took a backseat in the wake of new national and state level political leaderships in 1966 that had much thinner links with the Gandhian ideals and a leaning towards centralism and making the state governments subservient to the centre.And, the mounting food shortage of this period and crop failures led to reshuffling of priorities that focused on increasing agricultural production majorly. This reduced the role of the Panchayati raj from that of rural development to that of agricultural production as the new technologies for increased agricultural productivity gave leeway to the central government to enter the state and local governments' sphere of activity and subjects to implement the new programmes. The central government for implementing the new schemes and programmes in agriculture began to develop its own independent administrative hierarchies and  systematically bypassed the panchayati raj institutions.

All this was done through the bureaucracy,that is the District Collector at the local level and this led to alienation between bureaucracy and grassroot politicians viz. the ordering of affairs of the Panchayati Raj.

Coupled with this was the state government's lackadaisical attitude towards holding timely elections to these local bodies and when elected were suppressed by the state governments for the flimsiest of reasons. Inadequacy of funds available to these local bodies due to vested interests left them high and dry and incapable of initiating any developmental measures for the local community and thus they were totally on the mercy of the state and central governments.

Thus, seeing the pathetic condition of the Panchayati Raj Institutions, the Janata Party in 1977 set up  the Ashok Mehta Committee to examine the same. After examining the case, the committee recommended  the constitution of  two tier structure of PRIs with  'Mandal Panchayats' at the lower level and district level(Zilla Parishad) at the upper level.

Its detailed recommendations were:
i) A two tier structure (in place of a previously recommended three tier one) wherein the Zilla Parishad would remain the uppermost tier and  at the lower level,the ' Mandal Panchayat' was to be created for a cluster of villages having a population of 15 to 20 thousand and its 15 members to be directly elected by the people with a term of four years. He did not favour Gram Panchayats as he stated that the size of villages differed from district to district and hence there should be a standard benchmark for all districts. Note should be made, that after a while and conducting more studies he did recommend and favour the Block Level Panchayat Samiti arrangement to be kept as well as the intermediary between the Zilla Parishad and the Mandal Panchayats.

ii) The Zilla Parishad was to be the executive machinery at the District level.

iii) Participation of political parties in the elections to Panchayats to ensure continutiy of political process and aganda and making the local levels important and significant.

iv) Cabinet Minister with Panchayati Raj portfolio in the cabinet of the state Chief Minister to directly and specifically overlook the development of the local governments.

v) Constitution of a committee in the legislative assembly of the states to carry out a detailed scrutiny of the District Administration Programmes implementation in Panachayati Raj Institutions.

vi) Constitution of Nyaya Panchayats seperate from Development/Administrative Panchayat and to be headed by a Judicial Officer.

vii) Reservation of SC/ST in the Panchayats in proportion to their population in that Panchayat area and taxation powers to be given to the PRIs.

viii) Gram Sabha to be constituted together with the Gram Panchayat(elected representatives of the area through local people), consisting of all the electors/voters of that Panchayat area,who will be vested with the powers to consider the accounts and administration of the Panchayats and approve proposals for taxation and plans for development so that they are free from the hold of state governments, and they have to meet twice a year.


ix) Amendments to the Constitution to effect these changes.

x) The Chief Electoral Officer of the state in consultation with the Chief Election Commissioner should organise and conduct the Panchayati Raj elections.

xi) The state government should not supersede the Panchayat Raj institutions. In case of an imperative supersession, election should be held within 6 months from the date of supersession.

xii) The voluntary agencies should play an important role in mobilising the support of the people for Panchayati Raj.

As a result of this report, the Indian states of Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and West Bengal passed new legislation. However, the flow of politics at the state level later on did not allow the institutions to develop their own political dynamics.

Heavy centralisation during the Indira Gandhi regime subsequently started to bring back public opinion in favour of decentralisation seeing the shining models of Karnataka,Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal. So, when Rajiv Gandhi took over the reins, in order to consolidate his political mileage and interests that were deteriorating he took to the cause of Panchayati Raj Institutions to directly penetrate to the deepest level of voters bypassing the states. This was further strengthened by the L.M Singhvi's Commission on PRIs which recommended according of Constitutional status to PRIs and non involvement of Political parties in the elections to PRIs.

However, the bill was moved (64th Amendment) but fell flat in the upper house as Congress found itself out of power. In 1990, the National Front govt. under V.P Singh also moved another bill in the Parliament but it could not carry through as the govt. soon collapsed within no time.

Congress under the Prime Ministership of P.V Narsimha Rao in 1991 picked the PRI issue up again and consulted all major political parties while drafting the new PRI Bill and thus with all consent was passed in the parliament which was the 73rd Amendment Act in December 1991. It began operation in 1993 after its implementation was strategised and finalised and thus was opened a new chapter in History of the Panchayat Raj as a Constitutional body and made PRIs compulsory in all states and UTs with clear areas of jurisdiction and powers.









73RD CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT:

The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act is seen as the Magna Carta of decentralisation & social justice. The structure of the PRIs are broadly based on the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee report.


The main features of the Act Schedule XI, Part 9, ( Article 243 - 243o) are:
i) A 3 tier system of Panchayati Raj for all states having population of over 20 lakhs.
ii) All the seats in a panchayat at every level are to be filled by elections from respective territorial constituencies & Panchayat elections to be held regularly every 5 years.
iii) To appoint State Finance Commissions for making recommendations to suggest measures to strengthen finances of PRIs.
iv) To constitute District Planning Committees to prepare draft development plans and promote bottom-up-planning.
v) Estabilishment of State Election Commissions to supervise, direct and control the regular and smooth elections to panchayats
vi) Estabilishment of Gram Sabhas or village assembly as a deliberative body to decentralised governance.
vii) Reservation of seats for SC and ST and women ( not less than 1/3rd of seats).

An indicative list of 29 items has been given in Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution. Panchayats are expected to play an effective role in planning and implementation of works related to these 29 items.

The Gram Panchayat have been entrusted with both obligatory and discretionary functions which are both civic and developmental. The main emphasis being on development activities such as agriculture,primary education,health and sanitation and local amenities.

The Samithis throughout the country are entrusted with functions relating to planning and development. Its functions include agriculture and related activities, social welfare, education, health and sanitation,etc. They are also required to exercise supervision over the gram panchayats within its jurisdiction. In some Samithis, they also approve the budget of the Panchayats. In Maharasthra, the samithis implement development schemes formulated by Zilla Parishads and act as the committees of the latter.

The functions of the Zilla Parishad vary considerably from state to state. In some states they are concerned with supervisory and coordinating functions. In others they have specific role in regard to establishment and expansion of secondary education and vocational schools. In Maharasthra,however,it is the most important unit as it is entrusted with executive functions.













Nyaya Panchayats try petty civil and criminal cases and can impose fine. But they cannot award imprisonment. However, exceptions are there and in Bihar, Nyaya Panchayats may even award imprisonment. At times, Nyaya Panchayat gives only warning. District Officer may send for recommendation of any judgement given by Nyaya Panchayat. In general, the performance of Nyaya Panchayat is not encouraging because people do not appear before Nyaya Panchayats.

CURRENT SCENARIO:
At present, there are about 3 million elected representatives at all levels of the panchayat one-third of which are women. These members represent more than 2.4 lakh Gram Panchayats, about 6,000 intermediate level tiers and more than 500 district panchayats . Spread over the length and breadth of the country, the new panchayats cover about 96 per cent of India's more than 5.8 lakh villages and nearly 99.6 per cent of rural population. This is the largest experiment in decentralisation of governance in the history of humanity.
The Constitution visualises panchayats as institutions of self-governance. However, giving due consideration to the federal structure of our polity, most of the financial powers and authorities to be endowed on panchayats have been left at the discretion of concerned state legislatures. Consequently, the powers and functions vested in PRIs vary from state to state. These provisions combine representative and direct democracy into a synergy and are expected to result in an extension and deepening of democracy in India. Hence, panchayats have journeyed from an institution within the culture of India to attain constitutional status.



PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION AND SOLUTIONS:
i) The Centre and states continue to exercise powers in planning and the Panchayats do not enjoy autonomy financial and administrative as institutions of local self - government.

ii) The state governments often delay Panchayat elections on purely political considerations as they take advantage of the powers of issuing election notifications,delimitation of constituencies,earmarking of reserved seats and the State Election Commission's dependence upon the state govt. for logistic support including staff and finances. Therefor there is a need to strengthen the SECs by making specific provisions in the Constitution(through amendments to article 23k itself to make them independent of the state governments and draw expertise and guidance from the Election Commission of India and the State Election Commission shall submit its annual report to the Election Commission and to the Governor,every year and it may at any time submit special reports on any matter which in its opinion is of such urgency or importance that it should not be deferred till the submission of its annual report.

iii) Since the functions of the Panchayats are not posited as exclusive functions therefore, their role and governance depends on  the regime that controls the state government.

iv) States only assign them the responsibilities of implementing of the schemes/projects of the state and union,as a result they are only occupied with that and are not able to raise their might for the problems actually concerning the local areas/Panchayats they are in charge of. So, to correct this Article 243g of the Indian Constitution should be amended to declare the Panchayats as institutions of self-government and exclusive functions should be assigned to them that are clearly spelled out and demarcated for them.

v) State govts are still hesitant and reluctant in sharing their fiscal powers with the Panchayats and so there should be a separate tax domain/field exclusively for the PRIs and for this there should be an addition of a local list in the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution together with the Union,State,Concurrent and Residual lists so that they gain their fiscal autonomy at par with the union and states.

vi) State Finance Commissions after collecting the reports from the local levels should submit its report to the Finance Commission for fund allocation and Finance Commission should make their recommendations in this light.

vii) The Constitution is silent on the topic of power of PRIs to recruit their own personnel to manage its functions and this has led to the slow growth of PRIs as self governing institutions. Thus there needs to be an amendment regarding the same to confer them with such autonomy.

viii) There should be a provision in the Indian Constitution to provide the Panchayats with an opportunity of being heard before dissolution by the state governments as this ommission has only lead to state governments carrying out their malafides whenever they want and dissolving the PRIs and then delaying elections,etc.

ix) The lack of coordination amongst the PRI machinery also needs to be addressed immediately for smooth rural development. There should be a provision for constitution of a state Panchayat Council under the chairmanship of the Chief Minister may be made in the Indian Constitution. And, the leader of opposition may be made the ex-officio vice chairman of the Council to provide consensus to the development of Panchayats as fully democratic,efficient and responsible institutions.

x) There is a lack of accountability of Panchayats because of inadequate provisions in law relating to audit of accounts of public bodies. And, there is not time frame to conduct audit of accounts of a given year,submit the report or comply with the objections raised in the report thus leading to misuse of funds,bad implementation of projects and overall weakening of the system. Therefore there should be changes made to these provisions for completing all the above in the given year itself. And, to ensure uniformity in this practice relating to audits of accounts,the C&AG of India be empowered to conduct the audit or lay down accounting standards for Panchayats.



This post ends here.


___________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________




The next post will cover:

Urban Local Government:
Municipal governance: main features,
structures, finance and problem areas;
74th Constitutional Amendment; Globallocal
debate; New localism; Development
dynamics, politics and administration with
special reference to city management.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Administrative Reforms since Independence: Major concerns; Important Committees and Commissions; Reforms in financial management and human resource development; Problems of implementation.


________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________


ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS:
Reform - The word ' Reform ' means to make something better, to improve something or to remove the faults of something especially by changing its behaviour or structure.


Reform is an inherited feature of  Public(govt.) Administration because of the constant growth of its functions for catering to the ever increasing demands of society and to remain relevant in the changing times.


A single definition of Administrative reform has not been come to, however, there are two ways/approaches to understanding it:
i) Reform of Administration as a complex rebuilding of it.
ii) Reform to be a particular change within administration or just a modernising or improvising of administrative procedures.


Various aspects of Administrative reform are:
i) Political
ii) Legal
iii) Institutional
iv) Technical
v) Personnel
vi) Financial
viii) Social
ix) Psychological,etc.

These are often interlinked as well.


Stages in Administrative reform:
i) Theoretical
ii) Practical situation emergence for reform
iii) Preparation stage for implementation of reform
iv) Realisation of the reforms when there is success in achieving the stipulated aims that were pre-set.



Apart from national factors of reform, stress should also be put here on the role of International organisations such as UNO,EU,OECD, WB,IMF,etc. who push countries/members to reform their administrative practices through various means like development funds, Millennium Goals, Good Governance,Sanctions,etc.







ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SINCE INDEPENDENCE IN INDIA:
Independence opened up new and bigger challenges before the country as it was under a solemn obligation to bring about social and economic improvement which was an all-round improvement in the lives of the people of the country. The government is irrevocably committed to the DPSPs enshrined in the Constitution,which directs it actively to work for the economic and social well being of the people,refer to importance of DPSP - http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/09/philosophical-and-constitutional.html

Also, to achieve this apart from reforming administrative machinery,there was a need to reform the attitudes of the Civil services as well from a colonial hangover of domination and non transparency to sub servient to the people of India as envisaged in the Preamble of the Indian Constitution that begins with 'We, the people of India'.

The first reform in Public administration since Independence began with the introduction of the Parliamentary form of government based on Universal Adult Franchise which consequently transformed the civil services to an instrument/tool in the hands of the popularly elected government for implementation of its policies and programmes and a service provider to the public.

The next step in administrative reforms was the establishment of the All India Services,Central services and State services machinery.

After that came the decentralisation reform where Constitutional status was conferred upon local self governments in rural and urban areas which enhanced the arena and functions of Public administration.

 One must note that when the Constitution was being framed, the Constitution founding fathers did not pay much thought to the type of administrative machinery required for an Independent India as they felt that the inherited one was doing its job well,and,perhaps they also felt  that Constitutional and political changes were of major consequence that would automatically make its tool which is public administration undergo the requisite transformation under its impact.
However,such a interlink never really happened,and with the onset of the Planning Commission and its development Plans the painfully inadequate and weak administrative system was discovered. Thus, the first Five Year Plan called for reforms regarding the same.

So, the Staff Reorganisation Unit was setup in 1953, later renamed the Staff Inspection Unit under the Ministry of Finance to review staffing in government agencies with a view to achieve economy in staff consistent with administrative efficiency. This Unit is still in existence and doing useful work but is not directly or immediately related to administrative reform.

In 1954,the establishment of the O & M agency in the govt. located in the Cabinet Secretariat, to begin and sustain administrative efficiency in all branches of public administration brought in some hope for real administrative reforms. Its location in the Cabinet Secretariat enabled it to get cooperation and collaboration from all other Ministries and departments and direct them to achieve the same and keep them accountable. Refer to O & M in detail in this post - http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/08/techniques-of-administrative.html







MAJOR CONCERNS DRIVING ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS:

i) Efficiency and Economy
ii) Specialisation
iii) Effective cooperation and coordination
iv) Administration and Development of Personnel
v) Accountability
vi) Corruption








IMPORTANT COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS ON ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS SINCE INDEPENDENCE:
 The A.D. Gorwala Committee appointed in 1951 by the Planning Commission and in 1953 the Appleby Commission was set up as well to analyse the administrative machinery for implementing planned development submitted its report with the recommendation to introduce O & M procedures in govt. departments as well as setting up of IIPA for advancement of administrative knowledge which was subsequently implemented.
In 1956, the Planning Commission again constituted the Committee on Plan Projects to carry out studies in the field of projects,with a view of evolving suitable forms of organisation,methods,standards and techniques for avoiding waste and ensuring efficient execution of projects. This Committee was wound up as a separate entity in 1970 but played an important part in developing development administration. Refer to post on Development Administration - http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/08/development-dynamics-concept-of.html

The Second Pay Commission in 1959 recommended the pooling of the Secretariat and the attached offices into a single Headquarter organisation.

S. R. Das Committee, a one-man Commission which investigated allegations of corruption and misuse of power against Chief Minister Kairon of Punjab who lost his office as a result of his findings.

Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption, in its report in 1964,found that corruption was not confined to only lower rank of public service. It recommended the setting up of the Central Vigilance Commission armed with adequate powers as well as a code of conduct for Ministers on par with the Chief Ministers of all states. However, once must note here that this reform has been diluted and the CVC has only been conferred advisory/recommendation powers and has to recommend to/take permission from the respective ministry/dept in order to proceed with investigating against its erring officials on the complaint through the CBI. If this machinery has to be made relevant and powerful then there has to be a release of it from this permission system as well as making the CBI an independent organisation away from the clutches of the government. However, the CVC does publish its reports and as to why its recommendations were rejected by the respective Ministry/Officials and if there is a strong and vigilant opposition then it can make a lot of difference and it has made a difference time and again when the situation is favourable.

First Administrative Reforms was set up in 1966 - 1970 with Morarji Desai as its Chairman and on his becoming Deputy Prime Minister, K. Hanumanthaiya took over. The Commission submitted 20 reports discussing different areas of administration and reforms for it with detailed 500 recommendations.
The Commission recommended entry into the middle and senior management levels in secretariat from all services. As well as holding of a mid - career competitive written examination for filling middle and senior level positions in the government and many other recommendations pertaining to the Public Service Commissions, however all of these were turned down due to lack of political will and bureaucratic dominance over implementation of the recommendations,but its recommendations on Training were accepted and implemented in entirety by the government as a plausible means of administrative reform and capacity building.

The biggest issue with implementing recommendations of commissions and committees is that there isn't a sound policy for the same. The responsibility of accepting/rejecting such recommendations is left to the concerned Ministry/department. The implementation branch in the Department of Administrative reforms is ruled by bureaucrats dissect these reports before submitting it to the Cabinet,so a bureaucrat would never pass any recommendation that is uncomfortable for him and his status/position. So it is killed at the very beginning.
Also the ARC's recommendation for a strong Lokpal was also accepted but has yet to see the light of the day since almost half a century of its recommendation.

There is a need for reform here which was recommended in the ARC report as well, where an all-party Parliamentary committee should be set up to keep a watch over the implementation of the accepted recommendations and report on the other recommendations as to why it cannot be accepted. And, during this process the bureaucrats should be kept away. Within three months of receipt of the report from the Commission , the govt. should place before the Parliament a white paper indicating its decisions regarding the recommendations and debates and discussions should ensue by the Parliamentarians for fair play.

The Jha  Commission on Economic Administrative reforms advocated the need to move towards accountability in the positive sense so that greater importance was given to performance instead of rules and regulations/procedures. The concept of Management by Objectives was introduced in the form of Annual Action plan for Ministries and Departments and Memoranda Of Understanding with PSUs,which we can see today ( giving status to PSUs like Navratna and Maharatna,etc.). Similarly, an online monitoring of managerial performance in infrastructure sectors was inititated.

Post this,the administrative reforms have shifted their attention to micro-levels and has since become an area of bureaucrats through the nodal administrative reforms agency i.e. the Department of Personnel and Administrative reforms under the Home Ministry which is manned by career civil servants that would not pass hard reform measures and is only content with soft pedestrian level reforms. On the personnel side of its functions, the Department formulates policies relating to recruitment,training,promotion,employer-employee relations,service conditions,etc. in the civil service. Staff welfare,discipline and morale in civil service and integrity in administration form a part of its portfolio. It also determines the policy relating to administrative reform in India.
But,the range and nature of the work undertaken by the Department above, makes the term administrative reform inappropriate as they are more akin to administrative improvement only,that is improvement of existing structures only that carries a local meaning and significance and the official manning it are far away from actual problems of administration and are just performing clerical activities.

To be effective, the Department needs to look around for fresh ideas and alternatives in the field of Public administration through meaningful and intelligent comparative studies and debates of Public and Personnel administration forums at the national as well as international level and undertake research on the same. It needs to shed its veil of secrecy and interact with the public more to improve its status as well as functions and gain respect from all departments and ministries who treat it as an outsider and do not allow it to study them or advise them.

The Fifth and Sixth Pay Commissions brought in a lot of reforms as well for sustaining the integrity and honesty of public administrators through enhanced pays that were implemented.
The arrival of the New Industrial Policy and LPG brought in a lot of major reforms, like the introduction of ICT technology in administration ( E- Governance) and Public-Private partnership, as well as dis investments in PSUs which has led to a higher efficiency as well as effectiveness in administration.

The Punchchi Commission also is worth noting here - refer to http://www.preservearticles.com/2011092814259/what-were-the-main-recommendations-of-punchhi-commission.html


The Second Administrative reforms Commission headed by Veerappa Moily has recommended that the subject of Public Administration/Governance be made mandatory for aspiring civil servants, besides setting up National Institutes of Public Administration and the Central Services Authority. The Government of India has come up with a draft Public Services Bill (2007) that aims to change the nature of the civil services as well as face the challenges to governance in the context of complex global challenges. This paper presents an overview of the changing nature of civil services in India in the post-Independence period with emphasis on the reforms and the challenges ahead. Refer - http://arc.gov.in/

Implementing Aadhar or Unique Identification Authority of India.

Expenditure Reforms Commission - that emphasized on a drastic downsizing of the government staff strength for securing modern and professional governance and also reducing the increasing salary bill of the Government of India.

The D.S. Kothari Committee Report on Recruitment Policy and Selection Methods, 1976, interalia recommended a major change in the examination system. It recommended a two-stage examination process – a preliminary examination followed by a main examination. This Committee also suggested changes in the training pattern for the civil services.


The Department of Administrative Reforms and Public Grievances(DARPC) has proposed a framework for good governance in the form of a Code of Governance. The main components of this Code are: (i)improving service delivery; (ii) development of programmes for weaker sections and backward areas; (iii) technology and system improvement; (iv) financial management and budget sanctity; (v)accountability and transparency; (vi) public service morale and anti-corruption; and (vii) incentivizing reforms.


However,to conclude here,the opinion is that the central reform agency has failed in its mission and hardly rises above organisational and O& M levels. The Planning Commission provides the perspective for planning and the DARPC does the policy planning,however both of these organisations are ill staffed for the same as they have specialsits mostly who are distant from the administrative realities,so there is a need to have a seperate long term Administrative reforms organisation,free of bureaucrats and staffed with eminent people who have practical knowledge of the working of administration and its major concerns to bring in bold administrative reforms and also people need to be made aware of their rights as well as the duties and responsibilities the public officials owe to them in which the NGOs and NPOs as well as civil society can make a lot of contribution and difference.







REFORMS IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:
Public Finance Management basically deals with all aspects of resource mobilisation  and expenditure management in government. Very important in today's times as rising population and rising demands is leaving a big burden on the economy.

However Public Financial Management continues to be restricted to budget implementation,administration of payment systems,accounting and reporting in the states of funds received and spent.

Reforms however have been brought in that focus on results and outcomes rather than only on compliance with procedures as tools of modern financial management like IT and Financial information system are being implemented to improve efficiency and accountability.

Also the accounting system is being changed from cash based to accrual accounting for more transparency,clarity and efficiency.






REFORMS IN HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT:
There have been various commissions and committees set up mentioned above that also dealt with human resource development like training and capacity building as well as Pay Commissions that enhanced and recommended better recruitment & promotion practices as well as conditions of service,etc.

A mention should be made here of the reforms in the educational sector too for building the capacity of the human resource in a country like the Knowledge Commission and Education for all policy,setting up central and state open schools and universities as well as a variety of flexible as well as standardised distance learning courses as well as the enactment of the Right to Education Act.
Refer - http://mhrd.gov.in/policy_initiatives







PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF REFORMS:
i) Lack of Political will
ii) Lack of Bureaucratic will
iii) Bureaucratic stranglehold over administrative reforms
iv) Lack of long term strategising agency for administrative reforms free of bureaucratic stranglehold.
v) Lack of information dissemination among people and stakeholders of reforms being carried out.
vi) Over staffing and burden over the exchequer for paying salaries instead of diverting it to reforms implementations.
vii) Lack of comparative study and interaction of Administration practices and administrators internationally as well as among the public.
viii)Move from administrative improvement attitude within existing structures and machineries to proper administrative reformist attitudes that pushes the envelope.
ix) Lack of practical solutions and recommendations by the Commissions and committees at times due to idealistic/theoretical attitude or lack of practical experience in the subject.
x) Lack of awareness among public in regards to their rights and the public official's duties and responsibilities towards them.
 xi) Corruption and vested interests and weak anti corruption agencies.


___________________________________________________________________________
Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
___________________________________________________________________________