Tuesday, September 11, 2012

Union Government and Administration: Executive, Parliament, Judiciary - structure, functions, work processes; Recent trends; Intragovernmental relations; Cabinet Secretariat; Prime Minister’s Office; Central Secretariat; Ministries and Departments; Boards; Commissions; Attached offices; Field organizations.


We have already studied via previous articles of this blog viz. the developments,events and legislation that had taken place from the Vedic,Mauryan,Mughal rule right to the end of the British rule in India that led to the current and contemporary setup of the Indian State, Government as well as Administration in India.

____________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
____________________________________________________________________________


So, today we will discuss the modern and contemporary state of affairs regarding the same in India.





                                   ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP AND HIERARCHY IN INDIA:
                                                         









UNION GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF INDIA:
The Constitution of India provides for a federal structure,wherin the union and the states are independent in their functioning,however,at times in order to meet certain exigencies (like in an Emergency) in national interest, there are unique safeguards for it to assume a Unitary character(controlled/directed by the Union/Centre). This is a feature unique to the Indian Constitution,that is why it is called as a combination of federal and unitary features or quasi - federal. One can note this in the Constitution in its very first article,where it pronounces India as a union of states and article 3 specifies the supremacy of the Union Parliament where it can alter the states viz. their boundaries and their names,etc. in national interest,also unified judicial system,integrated Election machinery,Accounts and audit,and single citizenship,etc.

So the states do have a federal character in regards to the State list and the subjects listed in them under the constitution  and decision making on the same is instituted in their level which is democratic decentralisation and also stabilises these state machineries,however,under certain circumstances the unitary character takes over.

Under the Indian Constitution the Union list of subjects contains 97 areas/subjects on which the Union/Central/Federal Govt. possesses sole decision making powers. And the executive powers for administering the above mentioned subjects have been vested in the President under the Constitution to be directly exercised through him or through his subordinate officers in accordance with the Constitution. The President is a part of Parliament as no Bill can become an Act/Law unless he assents to it. An important note to be made here is that even though all administration in the country are carried out in his name yet he is just a nominal head and not the real ruler.The reason being for this is that the Constitution provides for a Parliamentary form of govt. where the Council of Ministers aiding and advising the President(head of State) are the real rulers of the State.

Administrative framework of the Union govt. under the Indian Constitution advocates the tenets of decentralisation as well as autonomy and initiative being vested in states and local units of govt. simultaneously accepting central planning and direction from the Centre/union.
Governmental leadership's objective is State Welfare as well as integration and participation of the people in administration and policies by allowing officials to bring in innovations and democratic values into administration and its practices and functions.

The administrative features and details of Indian Administration is a modified version of the Govt. Of India Act 1935 as the people of India were used to it and were content with its administration provisions.
Refer to these important acts - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_India_Act  & http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/08/accountability-and-control-concepts-of.html for details on Legislative,Executive and Judicial control over Indian Administration.


Below is detailed as to through which various posts/Offices and its officials,organisations and institutions the Union Governance as well as Administration is carried out.






EXECUTIVE - 1) THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA & HIS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
Go through this article - http://ibnlive.in.com/news/demystified-how-the-president-of-india-is-elected/268962-53.html

Apart from the above mentioned administrative functions of the President,he also summons,prorogues,addresses,sends messages to Parliament and dissolves the Lok Sabha,promulgates ordinances when Parliament is not in session,makes recommendations for financial and money bills and gives assents to transform bills in to Acts and makes certain appointments at the Union level executives,Chief Justice Of India and Union Public Service Commission members and Chairman as well as removal is done under his warrant and seal. He also grants pardon,reprieves,respites,remits or suspends sentences in certain cases.
All decisions taken by the ministries and Departments are to be signed by him in order to be passed.
He is the supreme commander of the Armed Forces.
He upholds the democratic,republic and federalist value of the Constitution through his election process where states participate as well along with the union parliament. So, he is indirectly elected by the people through their elected representatives.
He nominates 12 members to the Rajya Sabha from amongst persons who have special knowledge or practical experience in respect of such matters as literature, science, art and social service. By adopting the principle of nomination in Rajya Sabha, the Constitution has ensure that the nation must
also receive services of the most distinguished persons of the country who have earned distinction in their field of activity, many of whom may not like to face the rough and tumble of the election. By nominating them to Rajya Sabha, the state not only recognises their merit and confers honour on them, but also enables them to enrich the debates by their expertise and knowledge that they
have in different areas.
And the President also nominates 2 members of the Anglo Indian community in the Lok Sabha if he feels that they do not have adequate representation there.

A President can be removed from office through an impeachment process on the grounds of violation of Constitution with 14 days prior notice of such action. But it has not been specified as to what may be considered as a violation of the Constitution.
Also refer to - http://presidentofindia.nic.in/  &  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_India

Recent trends of Presidents taking active part and exercising their powers viz. issuing ordinance as well as others is a good move in the right direction so that the President also holds his own and keeps the political executive accountable and to work for the ultimate betterment of the people.







2) VICE PRESIDENT OF INDIA:
The Vice President is the next in rank of executive authority after the President. He is elected by both houses of parliament and not the states by proportional representation through single transferable vote. His term is also as the President's , that is 5 years. He serves as the ex officio (because of a person's position in a formal group) Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. He carries out duties of the President in his absence and also acts as  an ambassador of the country at times.
VP can be removed under no specified grounds by a resolution passed by an absolute majority of the Rajya Sabha and agreed to by the simple majority of the lower house or Lok Sabha with 14 days notice to the VP. These are his administrative functions.
Refer to - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vice_President_of_India







3) UNION COUNCIL OF MINISTERS & THE PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA & THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS :
The Union Council Of Ministers is an important organ of the Executive. It is responsible for preparing and introducing bills in Parliament,to aid and advise the President in the exercise of his functions and to determine policy and administer them and to implement the decisions adopted by the Parliament. This Union Council Of Ministers carry out their functions with the help of government officials and bureaucrats.

 The Union Council Of Ministers consists of :
i) Union Cabinet Ministers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_India). Refer - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Ministers,_India.
Details of this classification is detailed below in this article.

ii) Ministers of State ( Independent charge) & Ministers of State (under a Union minister) - A Minister of State is a junior Minister in the Union Council of Ministers in the Federal or Central Government who may assist a Union Cabinet minister or have independent charge of a ministry. Here "State" in the desgination title above refers to Union/Centre govt. and should not be mistaken for the other term/definition of state (like Gujrat,Delhi,etc.). It means that this Minister is a Minister/representative of the Central/Union govt. assisting the Union Cabinet Ministers in their duties under their Ministry/Dept, and is not part of any state region. Government of a state (like Assam,Bihar,etc). is a different configuration all together. An illustration is - There is a Minister of Defence who is a Union Cabinet Minister and under him there will be a Minister Of State for Defence. This sub-classification under the same Ministry/Dept. has been done for the sole purpose of a better administration and supervision of that Ministry/Dept.
The Minister Of State having Independent charge of a Ministry under the Union/Central govt.  does not assist any Union Cabinet Minister and handles his/her Ministry / dept. independently and reports directly to the Prime Minister on the same,examples of such independent union Ministers of State are - Ministry Of Women & Child Development,Ministry Of Mines,etc.
Refer  for list - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Ministers,_India

iii) Deputy Ministers : To assist the Ministers Of State(both types) in the administration of their functions
who are appointed by the president on the advice of the Prime Minister.
It is headed by the Prime Minister who need not necessarily be a member of any House of Parliament when appointed by the President but must secure a seat in either house within six months of the date of entering office.It is the prime duty of the Union COM to aid and advise the President in exercise of his functions. The Council is directly accountable to the Lok Sabha and is individually responsible to the President for the functioning of their ministry/dept. The Prime Minister as the head and leader of COM has the duty of directing,coordinating and conveying all decisions of the Council of ministers relating to the policy making,implementation and administration of the affairs of the Union and all information pertaining to it.
If there is a policy failure or lapse on the part of the government, all the members of the council are jointly responsible. If the budget or any such Bill proposed by the Union cabinet is rejected by the parliament then under the principle of collective responsibility the whole council of Ministers and PM have to resign thus dissolving the whole Union Cabinet leading to fresh elections within 6 months.If a vote of no confidence is passed against the government, then all the ministers headed by the Prime Minister have to resign.

Also refer to - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Ministers,_India & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prime_Minister_of_India & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_India






4) COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA (CAG) & HIS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:

Refer to previous post under topic of Audit and CAG- http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/08/financial-administration-monetary-and.html






5) ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
Under Article 324 of the Indian Constitution there is a provision based on the concept of Universal Adult Franchise for the appointing of an autonomous and constitutional body called the Election Commission for the administration of political process in the country by conducting and ensuring free and fair elections of Central and State legislatures as well as the elections of the President and Vice President.
This body comprises of a Chief Election COmmissioner and two Election COmmissioners who are of equal status and power as the former. They take decisions on the basis of a moajority consensus and not being directed by the Chief Election Commissioner. They are appointed by the President for a term of 6 years or till the age of 65 years,whatever comes first. To protect their autonomy and impartiality,they can only be removed by the President in the same manner and grounds of a judge of the Supreme Court. Other Election Commissioners cannot be removed unless a recommendation is given by the Chief Election Commissioner.
Under the Election Commission of India there are State Election Commissions in every state that aid and assist the Election Commission in matters of state and local govt. elections.
Its main functions are :
(i) The preparation of electoral rolls before each general election and registration of all
eligible voters.
(ii) The delimitation of constituencies.
(iii) The recognition of various political parties and allotment of election symbols to these
parties.
(iv) Preparation of code of conduct for the political parties.
(v) Keeping voters list up-to-date at all times.
(vi) The preparation of roster for central broad-casts and telecasts by various political parties,
etc.
(vii) The conduct of polls.
(viii) The Election Commissioner has not only the power of holding elections but also to
cancel it and order repoll of it if rigged. It is also the responsibility of the Election
Commission to hold by-elections.
(ix) To notify the dates and schedules of elections so that nomination papers are filled and
properly scrutinised before the elections.
(x) To request the President of India or the Governors of the States for requisitioning as
much staff as necessary for conducting elections.
(xi) Under the Peoples Representation Act, the Election Commission also has the power to disqualify a candidature.

It has advisory jurisdiction in matters of post election,disqualification of sitting members of Parliament and State legislatures. It has taken many steps in the recent times to ensure total rationality in conducting elections like providing electors with photo identity cards,restriction on opinion/exit polls,computerisation of electoral rolls,checking criminalisation of politics,ensuring strict compliance with model code of conduct during elections by election officials as well as candidates and parties,simplifying procedure for maintaining accounts and filing of candidates,etc.

The decisions of the Election Commission can be challenged by appropriate petitions in the High Court and Supreme Court. Election petitions can be filed before the High Court, in respect of elections to the Parliament and State Legislatures. In respect of elections for the offices of the President and Vice President, such petitions can only be filed before the Supreme Court.






6) FINANCE COMMISSION & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
Under article 280 of the Indian Constitution,the finance Commission is an autonomous and constitutional body. It is appointed every 5 years and consists of a Chairman and four other members.
Functions of the Finance Commission can be explicitly stated as:
  1. Distribution of net proceeds of taxes between Centre and the States, to be divided as per their respective contributions to the taxes.
  2. Determine factors governing Grants-in Aid to the states and the magnitude of the same.
  3. Work with the State Finance Commissions and suggest measures to augment the Consolidated Fund of the States so as to provide additional resources to Panchayats and Municipalities in the state.
Please refer - http://fincomindia.nic.in/ShowContent.aspx?uid1=2&uid2=1&uid3=0&uid4=0  &   http://fincomindia.nic.in/ShowContent.aspx?uid1=2&uid2=2&uid3=0&uid4=0

It has been off late being argued that the Planning Commission has been usurping the powers of the Finance Commission and has only reduced it to a advisory and recommendation body regarding funds and revenue sharing.
Planning Commission is to be discussed in the next article of this blog.






PARLIAMENT & ITS FUNCTIONS:
Parliament is the supreme legislative body of India. It presides over bills and passes them as Acts for the benefit of the country and its people as well as keeps a check on the Executive in every possible way. No funds can be taken out of the Consolidated Fund Of India without its permission. So,basically it is of immense importance as it is the one that sets the whole administrative and executive machinery into motion.
The Indian Parliament comprises of the President and the two Houses-Lok Sabha (House of the People) and Rajya Sabha (Council of States). The President has the power to summon and prorogue either House of Parliament or to dissolve Lok Sabha.
The same structure of legislation follows in the states with the exception that the President's representative is the Governor and some states have a unicameral legislature with the upper house that is the Vidhan Parishad as optional. The Chief minister and his state council of ministers and administrators at the State level are akin to the PM and his council at the Union level.

The Indian Constitution provides for a Parliamentary form of government. Refer - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_India
The Constitution of India came into force on January 26, 1950. The first general elections under the new Constitution were held during the year 1951-52 and the first elected Parliament came into being in April, 1952, the Second Lok Sabha in April, 1957, the Third Lok Sabha in April, 1962, the Fourth Lok Sabha in March, 1967, the Fifth Lok Sabha in March, 1971, the Sixth Lok Sabha in March, 1977, the Seventh Lok Sabha in January, 1980, the Eighth Lok Sabha in December, 1984, the Ninth Lok Sabha in December, 1989, the Tenth Lok Sabha in June, 1991, the Eleventh Lok Sabha in May, 1996, the Twelfth Lok Sabha in March, 1998, Thirteenth Lok Sabha in October, 1999, Fourteenth Lok Sabha in May, 2004 and Fifteenth Lok Sabha in April, 2009.

The recent trends of deteriorating standards of debates and attendance of Parliamentarians, stalling of parliament,coalition govt. and consequent instability in policy making,corruption as well as corporate lobbying for vested interests and criminalisation of politics has led to a very sad state of Indian parliament. However, active media and judicial activism and review along with civil society efforts still give a lot of hope. Along with that also the prospective bills on cleaning out unwanted elements from entering politics that are very certain to see the light of day are encouraging reports. Apart from this, citizens of the country should take the responsibility to educate themselves on policy matters as well as their rights and legal recourse that will help them take right decisions during elections as well as while holding the govt. and administration responsible for wrongdoings,commissions as well as omissions on their part. Also,the recent trends of weak Prime Ministers leading to unchecked and massive corruption has left a very bad taste in the mouth and its high time that some effective measures are taken to combat it like an effective Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayuktas in states.







JUDICIARY & JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION:
 Part IV of the Indian Constitution deals with the topic of separation of Judiciary from Executive and Legislature. The Constitution of India under article 124  provides for the establishment of a Supreme Court and an Independent Judiciary that is non partisan and promotes equality and liberty. It is integrated and unified consisting of Supreme Court(apex body),High Courts(Head of state's Judicial Administration) and District Courts(Head of District's Judicial Administration controlled by a district and sessions judge) and is focused on integrating the country. It provides that there shall be a Supreme Court whose role is that of a centralised Court,protector and interpreter of the Constitution and highest court of appeal,consisting of CJI and 30 other judges (in the beginning it was 7,then 52,then 25 and now in 2008 with an Amendment act has come to 30). The seat of the Supreme Court shall be in Delhi or at any such other place where CJI with the President's approval may prescribe ( article 130).
The bottommost or grass root levels at villages are the Nyaya Panchayats and then it goes right upto the Supreme Court via the  High Courts and District Courts.
The working of the High Court mainly, of a state, is to get the appeals from subordinate courts and the writ petitions related to the Article No. 226 of the Indian Constitution. Also the writ Jurisdiction serves as the original jurisdiction for the High Court. Each High Court of individual state has its different pre-defined territorial jurisdiction.
From the judiciary point of view, each state of India is divided clearly into different judicial districts with District and Sessions Judge. Such a designated judge is regarded as the District Judge designate, when presiding over civil cases, and as Sessions Judge while considering the criminal cases. The highest authorised judicial under a Judge of the High Court is the district and sessions judge. There are different courts dealing with civil jurisdiction with different names in various states under him in the hierarchy.
Below the District and sessions court judges there are courts of civil jurisdiction,known in different states as Munsifs,Sub-judges,civil judges,etc. In the same way at the district level,criminal judiciary comprises of  the Chief Judicial Magistrate and First and Second Class Magistrates. High courts are principal courts of original jurisdiction(where an aggrieved can straightaway approach the High Court without going through lower courts) in the state for issuing writs to protect fundamental rights.
The CJI is appointed by the president on the advice of the Council Of Ministers. And the President appoints Supreme Court and High Court judges on consultation with the CJI and nomination of judges by the Political executive from among legal experts and practitioners is more acceptable than any other process till date.
The Supreme Court has powers of Original Jurisdiction,Appellate jurisdiction as well as Advisory jurisdiction on any matter referred to it by the President for its consultation. For details -
http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/jurisdiction.htm &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_India & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:High_Courts_of_India & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_Courts_of_India
To protect the independence and autonomy of the Judges the removal process has been made very effective and not easily attainable. The only ground on which a Judge of the Supreme Court or High Court can be removed is proved misbehavior or incapacity through an impeachment process that is,a judge can only be removed by an order of the President passed after an address in each House of Parliament.Such address must be supported by a majority of the total membership of that House and by a majority of not less than two-third of the members present and voting. It must be presented to the President in the same Session.
The recent trend of Public interest litigation movement in India has brought in a whirlwind and watershed dimension to the ambit of the Judiciary and its service to people and promote socio economic justice and equality at a bigger platform. NGOs have played a big part in bringing a lot of cases to light. Refer - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-interest_litigation_(India)

In today's times of massive corruption, judicial activism as well as judicial review and PILs as well as suo motu powers of Judiciary are tools of great importance for taking action to make State institutions and administrative action abide by the tenets of the Indian Constitution and declare null and void the actions and laws passed by legislature that are against the Constitutional tenets.






ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIA & HIS FUNCTIONS:
He/She is the chief legal advisor to the Indian Govt. and its primary lawyer in the Supreme Court of India. He should be qualified to become a judge of the Supreme Court. He is appointed by the President under Article 76(1) of the Indian Constitution and holds office during the president's pleasure. He does not derive any fixed salary but only a consultation fee. However since he is appointed by the political party in power therefore it is likely for him to be biased. However, it being a Constitutional post,he/she is open for public scrutiny.







 INTRAGOVERNMENTAL / INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS:
Intra governmental/Intergovernmental relations refer to effective relations within as well as among/between various agencies/departments of the government in order to achieve completion of entire work scheme. The contemporary complexities require the government to operate on the principle of specialisation. Govt. in order to be more effective,efficient and focused go for the establishment of specialised and non specialised organisations. The Govt. operates with various departments having their own specific domains.
In such a scenario there shall always be a possibility that while making decisions in their domains they may act in a conflicting manner within each other. So there has been a recommendation to create a tandem so that they work in  unity to achieve the task with their specialisations being used effectively for the same. So there has been recommendations of a committee formation or formal rules and regulations to be prescribed for achieving a significant amount of necessary coherence within various depts and agencies working together.
The Gorwala committee has recommended that the Ministry of Finance give up its rigidisctic control over administrative ministries and act as a colleague ministry instead for helping and facilitating work.
The first Administrative Reforms Commission recommended the appointment of a Integrated Financial Advsor who would act as a link between Ministry of Finance and various Administrative Ministries so that proposals of the latter are effectively and quickly disposed off by the former.
Intra governmental relations are also managed through various committees of Secretaries appointed by the Union Cabinet secretary from time to time. The current arrangement of the Group Of Ministers(Inter related and interdependent ministries'/departments ministers forum for gaining consensus on decisions and taking swift action) and Empowered Group of ministers(An arrangement where a GOM is seen  working with some sort of delegated powers from the Union cabinet to decide policy matters independently at their respective ministerial/departmental level only) could also be seen as a useful mechanism for achieving necessary coordination in the functioning of inter dependant as well as standalone ministries.








UNION CABINET & UNION CABINET SECRETARIAT & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
Union Cabinet ( refer - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_India ) is an extra constitutional arrangement instituted within the Council of Ministers(COM) under the provisions of Business Rules Act. The Union Cabinet is the term used for a small group of important (Union cabinet rank) ministers and seniors of the COM who are exclusively responsible for giving overall policy framework to the country and decisions relating to the same and the Union Cabinet arrangement helps in collective decision making in the Union COM. The Union Cabinet portfolios include ones of extreme importance like Defence Minister,Home Minister,Foreign Affairs Minister,etc. The Union cabinet takes initiative in legislative matters and directs the Parliament on the same. The annual budget is prepared by the Union Cabinet.
This term has been used once under article 352 of the Indian Constitution but that too with no details.
The Union cabinet can issue directives to the State govts under certain circumstances and under state emergency it can virtually control the working of the latter as well.
Union Cabinet committees are formed so as to help in a detailed and descriptive analysis of the subjects that are functions of the Union  Cabinet and help in taking load of these matters from the Union Cabinet ministers. The officials appointed for this can be civil servants,people of distinguished experience in the subject matter,civil society and other central services officials,etc. These committees are appointed by the Prime minister on all such subjects that he feels important.
There are Standing union cabinet committees as well as Ad-Hoc Union Cabinet committees.
Some examples of Standing Union Cabinet Committee are : Union Cabinet Commission on Political affairs,Union Cabinet commission on economic affairs,Union Cabinet commission on appointments,Cabinet commission on Parliamentary affairs,infrastructure,security,etc.
The first Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) had recommended that there should be an appointment of committees on all major subjects like Agriculture,Civil supplies,Science and Technology,etc. It also recommended for all Union Cabinet committees to be headed either by PM or deputy PM and recognition of these committees under the Allocation of Business rules Act. A recommendation was also given for setting up of committees for all those Secretaries whose Ministers were part of some Union Cabinet committee so that the secretarial work is performed simultaneously,smoothly and efficiently.


Secretariat means 'Secretary's Office' . The secretary being the principal adviser to the Minister needs to be equipped with an office to assist him in discharge of his functions.
The Union Cabinet Secretariat(Refer http://cabsec.nic.in/about_origin.php) is an organisation designed to provide Secretarial assistance to the Union Cabinet in carrying out its business. It has an important coordinating role in the process of decision making at the highest level. It submits the cases to the Union cabinet and its committees,prepares records of decisions taken and follow up action on their implementation. The political headship of the Union cabinet secretariat rests with the Prime Minister and the administrative head of the secretariat is the Union Cabinet Secretary,a very senior civil servant and plays a pivotal role and is the principal advisor to the Union cabinet, and there is the other secretariat staff.
The Union Cabinet Secretary is the Ex-Officio and Chairman of the Civil Services Board of the Republic of India; the chief of the Indian Administrative Service and head of all civil services and Central Secretariat officers under the rules of business of the Government of India.

Functions of the Union Cabinet Secretariat under the Union Cabinet secretary are:
i) To provide secretariat machinery for effectively transacting the routine business of the Union cabinet and cases which a Minister puts to the Union cabinet for decision or direction and cases of disagreements between ministers. Proposals to vary or reverse a decision previously taken by the Union Cabinet. Cases which the President or Prime Minister may require to put to the Union Cabinet. And, proposals to withdraw a prosecution instituted by the Govt. of India. Cases involving financial implications.
ii) To work as the secretariat for the various cabinet committees like proposals to appoint committees of enquiry and consideration of reports of such committees.
iii) To keep the President,the Vice President and all the Ministers in touch with the major activities of all the ministries of the govt. Cases involving legislation including ordinances issues,addresses and messages of the President to the Parliament. Proposals to summon or prorogue the Parliament or dissolve Lok Sabha. Cases involving foreign treaties and negotiation issues.
iv) To coordinate the important central-state conferences convened by the various central ministries.
v) To prepare agenda for the weekly meetings of the cabinet,keep record of the discussions in the cabinet,and the decisions taken therein,circulate memorandum on issues awaiting the cabinet's approval,circulate decisions of the cabinet to each ministry,prepare and submit monthly summaries on a large number of specified subjects to the cabinet.


The Union Cabinet Secretariat  is organised into two departments:
a) Dept. of Cabinet Affairs(permanent department) - Further divided into three wings - i) Main Civil Secretariat : Which provides all the secretarial assistance in securing coordination and timely action by the Ministers and departments of the Govt. of India in all matters in which theUnion  cabinet or the Prime Minister is interested.
ii) Organisation and Methods Division: It functions directly under the Prime Minister. Its main functions are to supply leadership and drive,and,build up a common fund of information by a cooperative effort,experience and competence in O&M work. For detailed functions of a O&M division refer to O&M topic in this post http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/08/techniques-of-administrative.html
iii) Military Wing : It provides Secretariat services to the defence committee of the Cabinet,National Defence Council,Military Affairs Committee,Defence Minister's Committee,Defence Minister's Production Committee and a host of other committees dealing with Defence matters.
iii) Economic Wing: It is responsible for all the Secretarial work connected with the Economic committee of the Cabinet,Committee of Economic Secretaries and Supply Committee.

b) Department Of Statistics - An independent dept. created in April 1961,It is responsible for bringing coordination between various statistical organisations of the centre and states,and taking up initiatives for setting up agreed standards and norms,and for promoting in general the collection and compilation of statistics on scientific lines. It also provides administrative support to the central statistical organisation,national sample survey and Indian Statistical institute,the first two are attached offices of the Union cabinet secretariat and the third is a subordinate office of the Union cabinet secretariat).







 PRIME MINISTER'S OFFICE(PMO) & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTION:
The PMO came into existence in Aug 1947. Earlier it was known as the Prime Minister's Secretariat but was renamed the PMO in 1977. It is listed as a department in itself under the govt. of India Allocation of Business rules 1961. It does not have any attached or subordinate office under it. It acts as a link between PM and his Ministers,President,Governors,Chief ministers and Foreign representatives. On the other side,which is the public side where it is concerned with the party matters,personal correspondences,complaints from the public,etc. It is for the PM to efficiently carry out his duty as the Chairman of the Planning Commission and help the PM in performance of his functions as the head of the government.

Principal functions of the PMO:
i) To deal with all references which under the rules of business have to come to the PM.
ii) To help the PM in discharge of his overall responsibilities as the Chief Executive like liaison with the Union Ministries and the State govts on matters which the PM may be interested.
iii) To help the PM in discharge of his responsibilities as the Chairman of Planning Commission.
iv) To deal with Public relations side of the PMO.
v) TO provide PM assistance in the examination of cases submitted to him for order under prescribed rules.







DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PMO AND UNION CABINET SECRETARIAT:
PMO is a conventional office formed for convenience of administration and secretarial assistance to the PM whereas the Union Cabinet Secretariat is mentioned in the Constitution and is a legal body.
The PM is the head of the Union Cabinet and is a very sensitive post so he needs an exclusive extra filter and assistance in discharge of his varied and immensely important duties.
The Union Cabinet Secretariat on the other hand,though extremely pivotal is responsible for the overall administration and secretarial assistance to the whole Cabinet and various functions of the Ministries and departments.







CENTRAL SECRETARIAT & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
Refer to http://persmin.gov.in/DOPT_CSDivision_Index.asp

The Central Secretariat system in India is governed by Central Secretariat Service Rules, 1962, which has been issued under the powers of Article 309 of the Constitution, is based on two principles:
(1) The task of policy formulation needs to be separated from policy implementation.
(2) Maintaining Cadre of Officers operating on the tenure system is a prerequisite to the working of the Secretariat system.

The Central Secretariat is a policy making body of the government and is not, to undertake work of execution, unless necessitated by the lack of official agencies to perform certain tasks. Its head of hierarchy is the Union Cabinet Secretary whom it is responsible to and reports to. It's recruitment is done through the Staff Selection Commission's Combined Graduate Level Examination and its main task is to assist with secretarial support to all the ministries of the Centre and department heads and ensure smooth coordination between these ministries and departments and the Union Cabinet Secretariat as well as policy formulation in their respective ministries and departments.

The Central Secretariat normally performs the following functions:
(1) Assisting the minister in the discharge of his policy making and parliamentary functions.
(2) Framing legislation, rules and principles of procedure.
(3) Sectoral planning and programme formulation.
(4) (a) Budgeting and control of expenditure in respect of activities of the particular Ministry/department.
(b) Securing administrative and financial approval to operational programme and their subsequent modifications.
(c) Supervision and control over the execution of policies and programmes by the executive de­partments or semi-autonomous field agencies.
(d) Imitating steps to develop greater personnel and organizational competence both in the minis­try/department and its executive agencies.
(e) Assisting in increasing coordination at the Central level.
Structure of secretariat
The Central Secretariat is a collection of various ministries and departments secretaries. A ministry is responsible for the formulation of the policy of government within its sphere of responsibility as well as for the execution and review of that policy. A ministry, for the purpose of internal organisation, is divided into the following subgroups with an officer in charge of each of them.
The lowest of these units is the section in charge of a Section Officer and consists of a number of assistants, clerks, typists and peons. It deals with the work relating to the subject allotted to it. It is also referred as the office. Two sections constitute the branch which is under the charge of an under secretary, also known as the branch officer.
Two branches ordinarily form a division which is headed by a deputy secretary. When the volume of work in a ministry exceeds the manageable charge of a secretary, one or more wings are established with a joint secretary in charge of each wing.
At the top of the hierarchy comes the department which is headed by the secretary himself or in some case by an additional/special secretary. In some cases, a department may be as autonomous as a minister and equivalent to it in rank.






DIFFERENCE AND RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNION CABINET SECRETARIAT AND CENTRAL SECRETARIAT:
The Union Cabinet Secretariat ,as already mentioned in detail above, is for catering secretarial support and assistance exclusively to the Union Cabinet Ministers( refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabinet_of_India) and their respective ministries and departments, and on behalf of the Union Cabinet, it has to coordinate with the rest of the Central Council Of Ministers' (i.e. Ministers Of State and Deputy Ministers') ministries and departments as well as their respective secretariats (which are collectively known as the Central Secretariat ) and direct the latter .

The Central Secretariat,which is a collective term used to refer to the collective secretariat offices of  all (excluding the Union Cabinet) remaining Central/Union Council Of Ministers' Ministries and Departments( i.e. the Ministers Of State & Deputy Ministers), provides secretarial services to the respective Ministry/Dept under Central Union Council Of Ministers(excluding the Union Cabinet ones). Apart from that,it has to coordinate with and report to the Cabinet Secretary(Cabinet Secretariat) who heads them and is at the top of the hierarchy of all Civil services and secretariat offices in order to ensure smooth transaction of the administrative business and rules of the Govt. Of India.

The Union Cabinet Secretary(head of the Union Cabinet Secretariat) is under direct charge of the Prime Minister since the PM is the head of the Union Cabinet,and, a Joint Secretary/Deputy Secretary (who comes under the ambit of the Central Secretariat by heading an individual secretariat of a Central Ministry/Department of the Union Council Of Ministers(excluding the Union Cabinet)) is under direct charge of that respective Central Ministry's Minister or Department's head of which he has been allocated to for providing his secretariat services.





MINISTRIES AND DEPARTMENTS,BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS:
This topic has been explained in a previous article on this blog. Please refer to http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/07/organisations-theories-systems.html








ATTACHED OFFICES & THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
This comes under the Executive offices of the Govt. Of India along with Sub Ordinate Offices and Field organisations.
The Attached Offices refer to such agencies which have the responsibility of preparing the detailed plan for execution and which gives detailed directions to the sub ordinate office officers in regards to implementation. These offices are seen as repositories of knowledge for departments as well as sub ordinate agencies under it. It provides help to the departments for better analysis  of policy questions and also support Ministers in effective supervision over policy implementation. They help in review of functioning of sub ordinate offices and issue directions to them from time to time.






SUB - ORDINATE OFFICES & THEIR ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
These are the agencies responsible for the detailed execution of policies and decisions. These offices along with the Field establishments carry out policy execution. In departments where attached offices may not exist then these offices may have only the responsibility of planning and assistance functions.







FIELD ORGANISATIONS & ITS ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS:
It is the transaction and direct level organisation of policy implementation through physical effort. It is the basic level where physical implementation of policy takes place and is the first level interface between the people and administration.


The post ends here.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
_____________________________________________________________________________




The next article on this blog will cover:

Plans and Priorities:
Machinery of planning; Role, composition
and functions of the Planning Commission
and the National Development Council;
‘Indicative’ planning; Process of plan formulation
at Union and State levels; Constitutional
Amendments (1992) and decentralized
planning for economic development
and social justice.

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Public Sector Undertakings: Public sector in modern India; Forms of Public Sector Undertakings; Problems of autonomy, accountability and control; Impact of liberalization and privatization.



_______________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
_______________________________________________________________________________






PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
In India, a government-owned corporation is termed as a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU). This term is used to refer to companies in which the government (either the federal Union Government or the many state or territorial governments, or both) own a majority (51 percent or more) of the company equity. 






EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
During the British Rule the presence of factories and enterprises was conspicuous,however they were mostly built and used for vested interests of colonialism and thus did little good to India and its people.
Post Independence due to the above as well as other factors, India was in deep socio-economic issues. There was grave underdevelopment,along with disparities in income,unemployment,lack of trained manpower and a weak industrial base and investments,unacceptable infrastructural facilities,etc.
Therefore in order to self sustain and become self reliant the Public Sector Undertaking blueprint was developed under Planned Economic Development model of Socialist countries that would address all the above problems.






ROLE OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
PSUs have laid a strong foundation for the Industrial development of the country as it is not interested in profit making but nation building.
They leverage the government through major shareholding in the Industries to intervene in the economy in a major way thus helping in achieving the desired socio-economic objectives and long term goals.
They help in pushing the agricultural economy on to the progressive pathway and rural development as well as providing basic infrastructural facilities,educational and employment opportunities.







PUBLIC SECTOR IN MODERN INDIA:
In the beginning these PSUs were confined to those core and strategic industries that would not be touched by the private players like Railways,Coal and Oil,Heavy Industries,Forest industries,etc. due to heavy investment required along with a lot of time to complete and humongous risks involved that could lead to heavy loss if went wrong and also the private players lacked the expertise for the same.
Therefore,the public sector(govt.) entered the same and began the development.
The later or second phase witnessed steps like nationalisation of industries,sick units being taken over by private players,and the public sector entering into many other fields like manufacturing consumer goods,consultancy,contracting and transportation,etc.

Thus according to Industrial Policies taken out from time to time, there were three categories that industries were classified into with respect to the State's role:
i) Schedule A category was reserved for the future development of those industries that would be the exclusive responsibility of State.
ii) Schedule B category included Enterprises whose initiative of development would be driven principally by the State and then private participation would be allowed to supplement the efforts.
iii) Schedule C included remaining industries left to the private sector.

The latest Industrial policy of  1991 has thus under collapse of socialist model of development,non fulfillment of stated objectives of the State of PSUs leading to low growth,underdevelopment and Liberalisation,privatisation and globalisation principles brought in fundamental changes in the approach of public sector responsibilities and priorities where the role of the State is rolled back and restrictions removed along with New Public Management,Public Choice theory and Public-Private Partnership theories and practices taking over.







FORMS OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
i) Public Sector Enterprises - Where government (state or central or both) hold at least 51% shares. Its forms of organisation are Departments,Corporations,Company,Joint Enterprise,Development corporation. For details please refer to the classifications of the above mentioned in a previous post on this blog titled "Organisations"- 


( http://publicadministrationtheone.blogspot.in/2012/07/organisations-theories-systems.html ) 

and also refer to conferring of statuses  


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navratna


ii) Central Public Sector Enterprises - Classified into Strategic and Non Strategic. Their areas are: Arms and Ammunitions and allied items of defence equipments,defence aircrafts and warships. Atomic energy(except in the areas related to the operation of nuclear power and applications of radiation and radio-isotopes to agriculture, medicine and non-strategic industries). Railways transport. Further conferred with Maharatna,Navratna,Miniratna status,refer  


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navratna



iii) Public Sector Banks - Banks where government holds more than 50% or majority stake. 

Refer:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sector_banks_in_India


iv) Section 25 Companies -
Public Sector Enterprises having objects to promote commerce, art, science, religion, charity or any other useful purpose and not having any profit motive can be registered as non-profit company under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956.
This section empowers the Central Government to grant a licence directing that such an association may be registered as a company with limited liability, without the addition of the words `Limited' or `Private Limited' to its name.
Such companies are also called as the Non-profit or 'No Profit - No Loss' companies.







CHANGING SCENARIO OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
Their elevated status as drivers as economy was romanticist in approach and thus led to issues like over staffing ,corruption,wasteful practices,lack of work culture and motivation were unchecked and systematically ignored by the government and led to the subsidisation of these concerns by them. This led to permanent drainage on the exchequer. thus instead of socialist attitude these PSUs were developing an attitude of Statism with all its dangers.

Many reports and committees followed to understand the issue and these were the results:
i) Persistently loss making units that are irretrievable and either need to be disposed off or handed over to private sector for overhaul.

ii) Diversification into activities like producing bread and foot wear,where public enterprise intervention is superfluous.

iii) High wage bills to the total neglect of productivity.

iv) Under utilisation of capacities

v) Hasty nationalisation of sick concerns that ultimately turned out as an incentive for unscrupulous capitalists to bleed the enterprise white in the hope that once sick,the Govt's intensive care unit would automatically jump to rescue.

vi) Unprofessional personnel practices

vii) Appointment of politicians as part time chairmen

viii) Low calibre of senior executives

ix) Excessive rules and regulations causing red tapism

x) Non cooperation from controlling economic ministers residing in New Delhi

xi) Poor infrastructural linkages among various segments like power,coal,steel,cement,irrigation,transport and communication.

xii) Wrong product mix which saddles the public sector with unsold stock.

xiii) Obsolete technology

xiv) Unclear definition of objectives.

xv) Low profitability which is an impediment to successful plan implementations. THis is because of contradictions and dilemma in the socio economic objectives of the PSUs due their obligation to provide employment to a large base instead of profitability as well.

xvi) They are not permitted to change their economic prices for the services they render and goods they supply.






 PROBLEMS OF AUTONOMY IN PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
i) Chief executives of the PSUs not given a fixed tenure thus hampering policy stability and continuity in a definite manner.

ii) Minister allotted to the undertaking has full authority to terminate Chairman or Director or Chief Executive.

iii) Due to a short tenure (As per a Standing conference on Public Enterprise the average tenure is only 2 years) the Chief Executive is under constant pressure to show short term results at the cost of long term disadvantages.

iv) Many Committees have recommended that the procedure of contract termination of a CEO should be same as the appointment procedure,i.e. by an appointment committee of the cabinet's recommendation. This recommendation has been somewhat implemented by the Central government but with certain conditions.

v) Directors appointed by the government to the Board of Directors of PSUs try to influence the decision making process of the board without accepting responsibility at the end creating a lot of interference in their independent functioning and economical inititatives.

vi) Control from above is a big impediment in the functioning of PSUs as whenever a new project is taken up by a PSU it has to go through Expenditure Finance Committee and Project Investment Board which is very cumbersome and causes unnecessary delay and authoritarianism.

vii) No definite criteria for evaluation of performance of PSUs. On the basis of The Sen Gupta Committee recommendations certain memoranda of understanding have been signed with the PSUs and Central Govt. and State Govt. Recent one is between the Central Govt. and SAIL.

viii) Nepotism and favourability in PSU appointments by politicians leading to inefficiency and incompetency in functioning. Therefore merit should only be the criteria for selection.

ix) No proper retention policies for retaining competent staff from the lure of lucrative private offers.
x) Lack of corporate planning,inventory management,paucity of resources,not up to the mark pay scales,delay in project implementations.

xi) Lack of authority in taking a commercial mode in areas where opportunities exist for profit making and thus gets caught in bureaucratic and political red tapism thus keeping it bureaucratic in nature instead of a complementing approach of profitability and social obligations.

Another very good and effective measure to increase autonomy of PSUs introduced is the conferring of Navratna,Maharatna and Miniratna status to them.






ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTROL OF PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
The Parliamentary Committee on Public Undertakings since 1963 is a mechanism of accountability and control of parliament over the PSUs. Every year,it submits 6 reports that educate the public opinion but that is all what they seem to do. The latest device invoked to enforce accountability is a memorandum of understanding between the PSU/PSE and its undertaking Ministry. Since 1989 PSE in India had been put under a notice as it were to show results and in 1990 and 91 about 95 enterprises have signed MoUs. Latest is SAIL MoU with the Central Govt.
This has given these Undertakings and Enterprises necessary freedom as well as a clear defined objective to follow that are practical as well as the necessary control and accountability of PSUs to the people through the Parliament thus avoiding misuse of their powers.






IMPACT OF LIBERALIZATION AND PRIVATISATION ON PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS IN INDIA:
on 24th July 1991,the New Economic Policy was announced to be followed from there on that has been advocating for public sector reforms.

Under collapse of socialist model of development,non fulfillment of stated objectives of the State of PSUs leading to low growth,underdevelopment and Liberalisation,privatisation and globalisation principles brought in fundamental changes in the approach of public sector responsibilities and priorities where the role of the State is rolled back and restrictions removed along with New Public Management,Public Choice theory and Public-Private Partenership theories and practices taking over.

All theorists and experts have been propagating the need for the above mentioned. Also under the new economic policy,1991, there has been massive restructuring organisational set up,financial restructuring,introduction of modern management practices,greater autonomy for PSUs,disinvestments of public enterprises to raise resources for other needs and encourage wider citizen and worker participation in the ownership of industries that were under govt. monopoly,MoUs signed between PSU & PSE and centre and state govts greater efficiency,autonomy and accountability,and privatization.

There will be no further nationalisation pf private sector industries. Sick units are being referred to the Board Of Infrastructure,Finance and Reconstruction and consequent to this policy the Sick Industrial COmpanies Act 1985 was amended in 1991 to implement the same. As on March 1996, 56 sick units have been referred to the BIFR. To provide safety to these sick units' employees, the govt. created the National Renewal Fund under administrative control of the Ministry Of Finance.

Full finance and operational autonomy has been granted by Union govt to the nine leading PSUs through the Navratna status and the lesser autonomy status conferred on others under the Maharatna and Miniratnas status. These are only granted to profit making PSUs and Undertakings thus saving them from red tapism and process of going through the Expenditure Finance Committee and Project Investment Board (EFC & PIB) and will be free to raise resources domestically as well as internationally and enter into financial and technical joint ventures with them.

Even though the PSUs would continue to be audited by CAG and Parliamentary Scrutiny,there will be appointment of eminent part time directors to their boards to reduce the domination of government nominees.

Thus LPG into the economy has definitely helped the efficiency and growth of PSUs in India. However,private support under guidance and facilitation of State is more needed then privatisation of public enterprises as that will lead to a total domination of market in our economy which is not favourable. There is still a need to reduce bureaucratic way of functioning and upgrading the techniques of management and technology and also more effective accountability,retention and pay policies.

PSUs are still very important as they play a very important role in neutral and impartial implementation of a planned economy as well as socio-economic development and justice and regulating the monies in the economy efficiently.

________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
_______________________________________________________________________________





The next post on this blog will cover:

Union Government and Administration:
Executive, Parliament, Judiciary - structure,
functions, work processes; Recent trends;
Intragovernmental relations; Cabinet Secretariat;
Prime Minister’s Office; Central
Secretariat; Ministries and Departments;
Boards; Commissions; Attached offices;
Field organizations.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Philosophical and Constitutional framework of government: Salient features and value premises; Constitutionalism; Political culture; Bureaucracy and democracy; Bureaucracy and development.


Before we begin this article, many congratulations to all those who have qualified for the UPSC Civil Services Mains exam this year. All the best for your endeavours. May success be bestowed upon you as honest civil servants are the immediate need of the hour right now.

And to all those who could not make it this time, do not give up hope and keep going because Perseverance is an essential trait for Success.

To those who plan to appear in the future, good decision and wish you all the very best.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
_______________________________________________________________________________


This article will discuss all that is needed to understand the Philosophical framework and Constitutional framework on which the Government is based and within which it functions.

Terms to understand before proceeding:

1) Framework - An essential supporting structure of a building, vehicle, or object / A basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text / A system of rules,ideas or beliefs that is used to plan / decide or execute something.

2) Philosophical - Relating to the study of the use of reason in understanding the nature of a thing(s) / system / belief,etc.

3) Constitutional : How something is formed from different parts(Constituents) / Set of political principles by which a State or organisation is governed,especially in regards to the rights of the people governed.

4) State - There is no unanimous definition of State. However,
The state has four essential elements:
  1. Population - They together form the government and all functions of the govt. are for them so without them there is no foundation for anything else.
  2. Territory - Definite territory that includes lands,mountains,forests,water bodies,etc.
  3. Government - Legislature,Executive and Judiciary.
  4. Sovereignty- Vested in the people of India.
All of them together form the State and no one can be taken out.






PHILOSOPHICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF GOVERNMENT:
As one can easily comprehend from the above meaning of  the term "Constitutional", that all aspects/parts of a State or an Organisation / System are to be based or governed by a set of political principles that are enlisted in its Constitution.

Therefore, the Constitution is the framework / foundation for all aspects of polity and governance and their functioning emerges from the principles of its Constitution. The Constitution of India elaborately specifies the problems of relations between Union and States,problems relating to public services,special classes,SCs and STs.

It also elaborates a list of Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy. All of these together direct the functioning of all organs of State and whenever in doubt,one has to revert to the founding philosophy and principles of the constitution as envisaged by our freedom fighters to understand one's duties better. Therefore,the Constitution is the source of all legislation,policy as well as executive,military and judicial action in a country. They all function upon the framework of the Constitution and its philosophy which is detailed and enshrined in the preamble of the Constitution India and elaborated in the Directive Principles Of State Policy.

In order to understand the purpose and philosophy of the Constitution as well as the Philosophical framework of India and its government, one must tread into the minds of our constitution framers and freedom fighters. And to do that one can simply read and understand the Preamble of the Indian Constitution which is also called the philosophy and key of the Indian Constitution -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_Constitution_of_India
where words like sovereign,socialist,secular,democratic republic,socio-economic-political Justice,Liberty and freedom of expression,Equality of status and opportunity,promotion of Fraternity and Dignity,Unity and Integrity are the cardinal principles of the constitution and beautifully describe the noble ideas, spirit and conscience of our Constitution and its framers' minds as well as how the future caretakers/governments of India should carry out their duties and functions and last but not the least, it depicts the way India should be in all its glory.






SALIENT FEATURES AND VALUE PREMISES OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION:
 The Indian Constitution is a remarkable document. It is the most lengthy and detailed constitutional document in the world as it has borrowed most of its provisions from all known constitutions of the world so in such a way that it is suitable to existing conditions and needs of the country and also it has embodied modified results of judicial decisions of other countries to minimise any uncertainty..It occupies an important place in the constitutional history of the world for its unique combination of both rigidity as well as flexibility and quasi- federal(Not completely federal) political setup. That's why it is termed as 'sui-generis' meaning Unique.

 India has a written constitution which means that all provisions are laid down in black and white and follow a process if to be changed or repealed or updated. Britain has an unwritten constitution where provisions are based on conventions and traditions of land instead of a detailed comparative study of a written constitution.

Indian Constitution is seen as an example of meta (underlying definition) policy of State governance based on the noble ideals of democratic governance. Its framework provides for an arrangement that is democratic in character and where the Rule of Law is seen as the cardinal principle. The other cardinal principles as well as ideals of a modern State can be seen highlighted in the Preamble(discussed above). Indian Administration could be seen as an example of a well organised people oriented administration where the popular will or sovereign which is the people are considered as the supreme authority  guiding all policies in the country. The Indian Political arrangement is provided with the unique feature of a Union arrangement with a federal setup.

Parliamentary form of government here is adopted from the United Kingdom. A Parliamentary democracy system of government exists at both levels that is Centre and States. In this system,government / political executive is responsible to the parliament and not to the President. It has a strong Centre and vests the constituent and residual powers of legislation coded in lists to the central legislature which is the parliament. Here the executive is part of legislature and so conflicts are less likely to arise.

The Indian Constitution as mentioned above is commendable in its unique combination of flexibility and rigidity in legislative process that is adding and amending to the Constitution. That's why it is also known as quasi federal because a federal system has a very rigid constitution. And in a federal system states have completely autonomy and function with no interference at all from the centre and also every state possesses its own constitution and citizenship. So, coming back to the Indian constitutions quasi federal framework, it is only a few provisions of it that require a ratification by the states legislatures and even then only half of them need to do so. The rest of the constitution is amended by a simple majority of the Union Parliament as in general legislation. One can see the flexibility of our constitution as since independence it has been amended 97 times already ( Constitutional Amendment Acts).

The Constitution in its very first article pronounces India as a union of states and article 3 specifies the supremacy of the Union where the states could be altered viz. their boundaries and their names,etc. So the states do have a federal character in regards to the State list and the subjects listed in them and decision making on the same is instituted in their level which is democratic decentralisation and also stabilises these states machineries.

Article 5 of the Indian Constitution then proceeds to detail citizenship followed by Fundamental Rights in Part 3 (article 14-32) that guarantee various types of rights to the people of the country and also how to enforce them if violated and is adapted from the Bill of Rights of the American Constitution.

Part 4 of Indian Constitution then goes on to describe such principles which could be seen as directions and integral to the process of policy making in the country and are known as Directive Principles Of State Policy,an idea taken from Ireland's constitution. The DPSP are not enforceable by law(which means that if not followed by the State in policy making process then one cannot approach the Judiciary to get it enforced). So these guidelines for making policies are to be applied in the policy making process as long as the government has the resources to do so. The importance of DPSP is that it cannot be ignored especially in a welfare, as it helps in achieving a socialistic and people oriented modern State that has always been the cherished dream of our country's founding fathers.

Indian Constitution's provision for separation of powers is an integral and cardinal principle followed at both Union / Centre and state levels and the three organs of legislature,executive and judiciary have been established with sufficiently exclusive domains so that a constitutional deadlock does not occur where all are interfering in each other's work and no progress happens ultimately leading to a breakdown of each and every institution of the country.

And Independent judiciary also derives its power of Judicial review from the constitution although not explicitly but impliedly from article 13. India has a single integrated system of courts for the Union and States that administer both the Union and state laws and the apex or head body is the Supreme Court of India. Below the Supreme courts are the high Courts and below the High Courts are the subordinate courts. Judges are appointed by the President under his warrant and seal and to ensure their independence their terms and conditions of service as well as removal are regulated and directed by the Constitution. There is a special process of removal through a special majority(majority of total membership of that house and by majority of not less than 2/3 members of that house present and voting) of each house of parliament on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity,which is not easy. The Judiciary through the power of judicial review can pronounce upon the constitutional validity of acts of public authorities both executive as well as the legislature. It protects,guarantees and enforces the fundamental rights of the country's people and maintains federal equilibrium.

The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment to the constitution in principle has provided for the establishment and recognition to democratic local self governing institutions of Panchayat and Municipalities at the local level which are the grassroots of governance. During the drafting of the Constitution of India, Panchayati Raj Institutions were placed in the non-justiciable part of the Constitution, the Directive Principles of State Policy, as Article 40. The Article read 'the State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government'. However, no worthwhile legislation was enacted either at the national or state level to implement it.
In the four decades since the adoption of the Constitution, panchayat raj institutions have travelled from the non-justiciable part of the Constitution to one where, through a separate amendment, a whole new status has been added to their history.

The Constitution also provides for special provisions for the underprivileged and backward viz. SC,ST and OBC. Elaborate provisions have been given to various constitutional authorities guaranteeing autonomy and ensures their smooth functioning as per the rights given to them in the Indian Constitution.

Emergency provisions of the Constitution were added in the light of the German Constitution.






CONSTITUTIONALISM:
Constitutionalism is an abstract term and is used to denote the spirit and quality of the Constitution. An example that can be cited to explain it in detail can be that of a patriot, a patriot is one who loves his country and patriotism is an abstract term denoting the feeling of a patriot towards his country universally and generally. Similarly,a Constitution is an entity/physical object whereas constitutionalism is the feeling / abstractness of  that constitution residing in policies made by that particular country,the code of conduct followed by citizens and the political leaders while carrying out their functions both professionally as well as professionally,etc. all abiding by the constitution while doing so and imbibing a feeling of constitutionalism inside them,that is a love towards or an adherence towards a system of constitutional ideals and directions as well as government.
Therefore, Constitutionalism is a complex of ideas, attitudes, and patterns of behavior elaborating the principle that the authority of government derives from and is limited by a body of fundamental law.
The Indian Constitutionalism is a thought that provides for an arrangement where the rule of law is seen as the guiding principle for managing the State.
It evolved as a thought in USA,France and other nations where people questioned their governments for their arbitrary behaviour and thus the idea was formed of a govt. limited by a set of rules.


Constitutionalism has been seen as having various essential aspects as its core premises which are:
1) Sovereignty - It puts forward democratic values where the source of power is seen vested with the people and popular will and not in the hands of a few elites / politicians or corporates.

2) Writteness of the Constitution: A properly codified constitution builds constitutionalism as a feeling among everyone as it directs the people in power as well as administrators in a specified and proper way so that no arbitrariness is practiced anywhere.

3) Separation of Powers between the three organs of government which are legislature,executive and judiciary.

4) Consensus of agreeableness: The Constitution provides for the State to be guided by the popular will and good always and also to respect and agree to the institutional legal structures so that social conformity is achieved as prescribed by the Constitution.

5) Entrenchment: Total reject of arbitrariness practiced by public officials and leaders beyond their powers and rules prescribed. And secularism is practiced to maintain unity in diversity.






VIEWS ON CONSTITUTIONALISM:

1) Prescriptive view - It advocates the incorporation of features which have evolved as the core value premises of the constitution. Under it the attempt has been to bring up such a philosophy that would enable and guarantee such an administrative arrangement  where publicness / transparency of all governmental functioning becomes the cardinal principle to be followed. Certain values like Rule Of Law,Writteness of the Constitution,consensus,separation of powers,etc can be counted.

2) Descriptive view - It provides for the historical struggle that has been there in the powers which ultimately resulted in certain core premises and principles of the constitution. Under it administrative arrangement of the State is analysed in terms of the changes incorporated and the reasons/revolts behind them are also analysed.







POLITICAL CULTURE:
 Political culture refers to the political psychology,values and attitude of a country / nation or a sub groups reaction towards their political leaders / political system, different political changes and public officials and their legitimacy.
It is not affected by different groups having different ideologies as even such groups can share the same political culture.  People of a society share a common human nature like emotional drives,intellectual capacities and moral perspectives and this expresses itself in the form of certain values,beliefs and emotional attitudes which get transmitted from one generation to another with lesser or greater changes / modifications and that defines the political situation in which political action takes place.
India has a multiple political culture due variety in traditions,tribalism,primordialism,religion influences,caste,traditions and conventions,etc existing in different parts of it.

Almond and Powell has discussed Political Culture in regards to the following three dimensions:
i) Cognitive Orientations - Implying knowledge accurate or otherwise.
ii) Affection Orientations - Implying feelings of attachment,involvement,rejection in regards to political objects.
iii) Evaluative orientations - Implying judgements and opinions about a political system.

Almond and Finer analysed Political culture from the perspective of the participation that the society allows in the political process.

Almond and Verba have given a 3 dimensional view of Political culture :
i) Parochial political culture - Is present in those societies where specialisation does not exist and only one  or two institutions are authoritative regarding all functions of that society and only one arch ruler is there who heads that institution thus having hegemony and unfettered power. People in such a society are not educated and informed about the mechanism and even if they have it is insufficient to form any opinion. And so the rule or dictatorship of the one ruler continues unopposed.

ii) Subject political Culture - Is present in such societies that were under colonial power at some point in time. Here two types of people's attitudes towards political system prevails,one of absolute subordination and one of absolute revolt at different points in time.

iii) Participant Political culture -  Is present in such societies having a high level of development and people in it have sufficient awareness and knowledge regarding their rights and duties and thus, play an active role in the discharge of functions. This type of a culture is practiced in India to quite an extent.

Robert Dahl has bestowed upon Political culture the title of the single most important factor that explains different patterns of political opposition:
i) Orientation of problem solving - Whether the opposition is interested in being rational and pragmatic in solving the issues raised.
ii) Orientation to collective actions - Whether the opposition is cooperative or not in discharge of functions of itself or others.
iii) Orientation to political system - Whether the opposition is active/passive or alienates itself.
iv) Orientation towards other people - Whether the opposition is full of tests or not.

Talcott Parsons look to find out the role of predispositions of people like historical memories,norms,emotions,symbols,etc. towards political actions  Their studies in Political culture have been done using two traditional approaches:
i) Individualistic Approach - It examines the values and attitudes of individuals through some technique of survey or feedback obtained from respondents(people). It is a direct method but limitations are that the respondents may not be able to express their feelings at many times. Further, the questionnaire itself may be so designed as to eliminate the political view of the people. The feelings mentioned by the people also may lead to all sorts of understandings and be very subjective.

ii) Institutional Approach - Involves documents analysis to discern collective behaviour of political institutions. It pursues the following three dimensions:
a) Academic deliberation to surface features of constitution,political structure and legislative framework.
b) Analysis of the Geographical and social operators in the State.
c) Analysis of historical events that have shaped political views.





TYPES OF POLITICAL CULTURE:

1) Traditional Political Culture - Where the political system and people's attitude towards it are influenced by primordial characters and conventions / traditions.

2) Modern Political culture - Where the political system and people's attitudes towards it are influenced by constitution,rule of law,Independent Judiciary,Liberalism,duly elected body of public bureaucracy as an efficient instrument to enforce the law.

In India there exists an amalgamation of both living in confrontation and cooperation.  Like bureaucracy is there but it functions keeping in mind the conventions and traditions of the society. Reservation system in politics is based on caste and tribe division. And the constitution spells out the rest that consists of modern political culture.






CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF POLITICAL CULTURE:
 1) Strengths - It helps in providing a comprehensive analysis to the part of political science dealing with political aspirations and people living in the State.
It links the beliefs,attitudes and value of the people in the State with the political system of the State.
It helps bridge gaps of philosophy since it deals with human psychosis that could not be explained by other principles.
It has encouraged political scientists to take into account the social and cultural factors in their analysis for the purpose of better framework of their policies and connect between different societies.
It helps in gaining a better view of human behaviour towards political arrangement in different societies.
It provides a conceptual basis that facilitates forecasting to an extent.




2) Limitations  - Its findings are considered to have subjective aspects in its conclusions as it is dealing with factors like human emotions,feelings,perceptions,etc.
It has been observed that in the studies of Political culture there is always a risk that researchers may neglect certain factors in order to achieve validation of their hypothesis.
Diversity in society may create problems in deriving conclusions.
Embodiment of the feelings/perception may not be verbally in the desired direction.






BUREAUCRACY AND DEMOCRACY:
It has been considered by some theorists that Bureaucracy and Democracy are two opposing ideologies. Democracy is associated with free will and self control whereas Bureaucracy has been considered as formal and rule bound.

So in both,academic as well as literature they are seen as anti-thetical approaches.
Democracy governance is based on the integral premise of control by people and expression of their will is seen as the core thought backing the execution of functions. Democratic institutions are considered responsive to the wishes of the public and attempts to arrange those preferences in order to give a positive outcome to its citizens.

Bureaucracy on the other hand is conceptualised as being typically legalistic and largely coded mechanism indifferent to the people's wishes and emphasising purely on legal framework.

Democracy has been seen as one of the most significant philosophy and value of the modern State arrangement as it is seen as a guarantee for the policies to be oriented towards the public at large and the resources in the State to be employed as per priorities set by the people. In a democratic setup to have a specialised Bureaucratic machinery appears paradoxical and its observed that the two have opposing elements. The presence of Bureaucracy is democratic arrangement has been questioned and studies have been made to establish the reasons for such an existence and the reasonability behind the existence.

At first sight, it appears that the complicity in society and the aim to have a high degree of speciality in a State somewhere must have necessitated the discharge of functions by specialist Bureaucracy. Various studies have been attempted to understand the comprehensional as well as the paradoxical aspect of the two.

Caplin in his studies in 2007 produced that Bureaucracy shall be required in the exercise of State function as people out of their pure democratic will may select inconsistent goals which may not be possible to be applied practically.

Richard Rose in 1991 observed that a linkage between voting and policy choices in conventional democracies may not be as clear as what most of the democrats may like to believe. Relationship between Bureaucracy and Democracy has been seen both supporting and opposing. The relationship between the two have been shown paradoxical because Democracy is free will while Bureaucracy champions the cause of pre established structure. It has been observed that an effective Democracy shall require an efficient Bureaucracy for attainment of the goal determined in a Democratic manner. Similarly, an efficient Bureaucracy in order to be effective requires directions coming from people's will so that its relevance in the society could be validated. The thought has surfaced the necessity of such an arrangement where the complimentary aspect of the two gets reinforced and the policy process in a State could be effective and efficient in its functioning.

It has been observed that these two aspects of the government may appear anti thetical on face,but both of them are necessary for providing effective and responsive governance. The responsiveness of the Democratic government is required to balance with impartiality and predictability assumed to reside with the Bureaucratic institutions. Likewise Democratic process is seen important in conferring legitimacy to the functioning of the Bureaucratic arrangement. Democracy provides for value of participation which is seen as a highly significant. An important trend has surfaced where association with a political party has been on the decrease and the representative democracy has been facing some sort of disinterest and alienation from the side of the people. In the democratic arrangement where involvement of people in the political process has been seen limited to casting votes during elections, disinterest and alienation have been very high. Under such societies people are not able to see some meaningful expression in the process of participation and for this reason they develop a feeling of disinterest,alienation or helplessness about the system.

Participation at the execution level thus has been seen as an important mechanism through which people could be introduced back into the system and Bureaucracy and citizens could be seen as a collective entity for this purpose.

Further the linkage between Bureaucracy and Democracy has been seen as necessary in a multi group situation transaction. The new philosophical paradigms have suggested achieving a balanced relationship between the formal Bureaucracy and the will of the people.

Goodin in his studies of 2004 has suggested for an arrangement of output democracy where establishment of such arrangement has been recommended through which delivery could be facilitated. Goodin has observed that there shall be a mechanism where conventional good of Democracy gets the directional of formal consent Bureaucracy. Arrangements like video conferencing,e-governance,direct participation could be seen providing the necessary space to will of the people in discharge of functions. Under New Public Management Osborne and Gabler had considered bureaucrats in the role of public manager and has asked them to play as facilitators. Bureaucracy has been seen in a catalytic role for the same. Democratic components in the governance,community owned government are prescribed. Controls have been suggested to be pushed out of Bureaucracy and handed over to the people.






BUREAUCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT:
Bureaucracy and development are two components of development philosophy if seen from an overview seem to possess opposing values(ideas) as Bureaucracy represents static or orthodox and rigid values while Development advocates dynamic(moving) values. Bureaucracy viewed by the Weberian model and other theorists pertains to same routine,unchanged and repeated procedures that enable it to continue,achieve its pre-established goals and handle its problems like a system without being influenced by external factors. Development as a concept on the other hand is seen as a phenomenon influenced by the concept of change and is quick to adapt and adjust to changes coming in through both external as well as internal factors on the way to development. It is the administrative process evolved for developing countries. And in the developing countries till now Bureaucracy by shedding its Weberian character is the only neutral,biggest existing and stable machinery that can achieve and lead the way towards the process of development in the developing countries. Therefore in the context of developing countries Bureaucracy and development are complementary and inter dependant instead of being hostile to one another for the purpose of Development Administration. In order to sensitise the bureaucracy for development processes it is suggested to provide them training in attitudinal changes and incorporate dynamic and social values in them to know the requirement,preparation of strategy and implementation of programmes in the present ecological setting in order to uplift the socio-cultural and economic status of the country. Bureaucracy,apart from its own duties like development policy formulation and implementation as well as educating people about the policies has been suggested to utilise their specialist knowledge in order to play the role of a friend,facilitator,coordinator,guardian,philosopher and guide to the factors like market and civil societies as well as other instruments of development administration(as listed above under the same heading) in the process of development and the bureaucrats have been asked to patiently assist people in the same. Therefore,as one can understand now that overall evaluation and implementation of Development Administration programmes are carried out by the Bureaucracy playing the leading role in developing nations.



This post ends here.

_______________________________________________________________________________

Click on ' JOIN THIS SITE ' to get instant updates on new posts on this blog. And also for 'INTERACTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS' regarding this blog's posts 'JOIN ITS FACEBOOK COMMUNITY/GROUP' that is mentioned on the right hand side of this page.
_______________________________________________________________________________





The next post on this blog will deal with:

Public Sector Undertakings:
Public sector in modern India; Forms of
Public Sector Undertakings; Problems of
autonomy, accountability and control; Impact
of liberalization and privatization.