Prevalence of Colonial Influence in India’s Bureaucracy: Unraveling the Legacy - Ashutosh Debata

 India’s colonial past continues to cast a long shadow over many aspects of its society and institutions. One area where this influence remains particularly pronounced is the bureaucracy. The bureaucratic system in India, inherited from British colonial rule, reflects deep-rooted structures and practices that have persisted over time. This article explores the prevalence of colonial influence in India’s bureaucracy, delving into its historical origins, examining its impact on governance and administration, and discussing the need for reforms to ensure a more inclusive and efficient bureaucracy. 

The roots of India’s bureaucratic structure can be traced back to the British Raj, when the British colonial administration established a highly centralized and hierarchical system to govern the country. The British bureaucracy was characterized by its rigid hierarchy, bureaucratic red tape, and a top-down decision-making process. These features have seeped into the Indian bureaucratic system, shaping its functioning even after independence.

One of the enduring legacies of colonial influence is the focus on rules and procedures over outcomes. The bureaucracy in India often places a disproportionate emphasis on adhering to established protocols and bureaucratic formalities, which can hinder efficiency and responsiveness. This bureaucratic red tape can be a significant barrier to timely decision-making and effective implementation of policies, leading to delays and inefficiencies.

Another aspect of colonial influence is the hierarchical nature of the bureaucracy. The British introduced a clear distinction between the ruling class and the subjects, and this divide often perpetuated a culture of elitism and a sense of entitlement among bureaucrats. This hierarchical structure can impede the free flow of ideas, discourage innovative thinking, and create a disconnect between the bureaucracy and the citizens it is meant to serve.

Additionally, the colonial influence is evident in the lack of diversity and inclusivity within the bureaucratic system. The British administration primarily recruited individuals from the privileged classes, perpetuating a system that was dominated by a particular section of society. Even today, the Indian bureaucracy struggles with issues of representation and inclusivity, with underrepresentation of marginalized communities and limited opportunities for individuals from diverse backgrounds to rise to leadership positions.

The need for reform in India’s bureaucratic system is apparent. Efforts should be made to streamline bureaucratic processes, reduce red tape, and foster a culture of efficiency and accountability. Reforms should also prioritize inclusivity and diversity, ensuring representation from all sections of society within the bureaucracy. This can be achieved through targeted recruitment policies, training programs, and mentorship opportunities for individuals from marginalized communities.

Furthermore, the bureaucratic system should embrace a more participatory and consultative approach to decision-making. Engaging with citizens, civil society organizations, and experts from various fields can bring fresh perspectives, promote transparency, and enhance the quality of governance. Decentralization of decision-making powers can also empower local administrations and foster a sense of ownership and accountability at the grassroots level.

The transformation of India’s bureaucratic system requires a comprehensive and multi-faceted approach. It necessitates a critical examination of the colonial influences that still permeate the system and a collective effort to reform and modernize administrative practices. By moving away from the legacy of colonial bureaucracy, India can build a more inclusive, efficient, and citizen-centric administrative machinery that aligns with the needs and aspirations of its diverse population.

In conclusion, the prevalence of colonial influence in India’s bureaucracy is a significant challenge that the country must address. The bureaucratic system, inherited from the British colonial era, perpetuates hierarchical structures, bureaucratic red tape, and limited diversity. Reforms aimed at streamlining processes, promoting inclusivity, and embracing a participatory approach are necessary to create a bureaucracy that is efficient, responsive, and reflective of India’s vibrant and diverse society. By unraveling the legacy of colonial influence, India can forge a path towards a more effective and citizen-centric administrative system.

Courtesy: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/beyond-the-headlines/prevalence-of-colonial-influence-in-indias-bureaucracy-unraveling-the-legacy-54081/

The Daring Saga of the Kshatriya-śrēṇis - Sandeep Balakrishna

 FROM THE MAURYAN PERIOD onwards, we had entire villages made up of a single guild and these guild-villages were given royal protection through a regulation: no guilds other than local cooperative guilds shall find entrance into such villages. For a protracted period of our history, we have ample evidence showing how, in many kingdoms, some guild-villages were so wealthy that they lent money to the King himself in times of need.

Community Service by Guilds

In fact, guilds and corporations played a central role in executing what are today known as community projects, and they took this role seriously, and punctiliously left behind stellar track records inscribing their demonstrated spirit of public service.

Apart from guilds, the village headman who was also the chief of the Village Assembly, actively encouraged his people to contribute to public works in some fashion. The Arthasastra explicitly says that “ if any one refuses to give his help in work beneficial to all, he shall be compelled to pay double the value of the aforesaid help due from him.” The village also had a common fund to which everyone including guilds contributed. The fund was also augmented by fines levied on “lazy” or work-shirkers.

Kautilya minces no words when he says that “ the acquisition of the help of corporations is better than the acquisition of an army, a friend, or profit.” Accordingly, corporate bodies throughout Hindu history were accorded special privileges. Guilds of artisans and workmen (Saṅghabhr̥tāḥ) enjoyed a grace period of seven nights over and above the project completion date. In some cases, they were even exempted from paying the mandatory security deposit to the treasury before starting a new business or project.

Some examples of guild-driven community projects included the construction of roads and bridges (Setubandha) and community buildings of any kind (rest houses, mandapams, hospitals, parks, etc). Given the cost of such large infrastructural endeavours, several guilds came together in a spirit of genuine cooperation to fund them. The State in turn, recognised that these initiatives were “beneficial to the whole country” and would “adorn the villages” and gave special concessions (priyahitam) and tax breaks to such guilds. Incredibly, their job didn’t end after the construction; guilds maintained their own watch-guards to patrol these roads.

The Vibrant World of Kshatriya-śrēṇis

Which brings us to another pronounced feature in the history and the evolution of our guilds and corporations. Over time, guilds and corporations had emerged as formidable, quasi military powers – that is, they were equipped with impressive private armies. Among others, this is indicated by the term, śrēṇi-vala which meant a class of troops that the king might call upon or enlist during war time or crises. Some powerful corporations were deliberately stationed in border towns to serve as deterrents to enemy kingdoms. In his Arthasastra, Kautilya mentions Kshatriya guilds which were found in abundance in the Kamboja (now eastern Afghanistan) and Saurashtra countries, and these guilds pursued war, and trade and agriculture in peacetime. In the chapter titled The Conduct of Corporations, he clearly lauds them as being “invincible to the enemy” and urges the king to secure their services and loyalty through gifts and conciliation.

In fact, the term śrēṇi-vala occurs in the Mahabharata itself while the Ramayana gives the word Sāyōdha śrēṇi or armed guilds. The other terms denoting armed guilds include Āyudha-jīvi, and Kshatriya śrēṇi – i.e., guilds who lived by the profession of arms.

Throughout the post-Mauryan period, armed guilds played a significant and decisive role in Indian politics. Even as Hindu political power in north India was being cannibalized by alien Muslim invasions, these Hindu armed guilds maintained their dominance in south India. The Chola Era reveals an outstanding scene of the power and prestige that these armed guilds enjoyed. The Vēlaikkāra community dominated the business and political life of the tenth and eleventh centuries. Two of its most powerful subgroups included the Vaḷaṅgai (Right Hand) Iḍaṅgai (Left Hand). Both Rajaraja Chola I and Rajendra Chola I named their army regiments after these two military guilds.

SOME OF THE MORE ENTERPRISING Vaḷaṅgai and Iḍaṅgai guilds were hired by Sri Lankan rulers for participating in wars, quelling insurrections, and providing security. An incredible inscription from Polannaruwa gives us eye-opening information about the prowess and influence of the Vēlaikkāra community of guilds.

Here is the summary of the inscription.

Devasena, the chieftain of King Vijayabahu of Sri Lanka constructed a Dhātu-bhavana or a temple containing the relic of the tooth of the Jina (Bhagavan Mahavira) in the city of Pulasti. Once the temple was finished, Devasena enlisted an army of Vēlaikkāras from the Tamil country to protect it. The enlistment procedure is described as follows:

The pious and the learned royal preceptor Vyarinimula, the mahāsthaviras of Utturulmulai together with the king’s ministers, called for a meeting of the members of the Mahātantra. These assembled together, bringing with them their leaders, the Vaḷḷan̄jiyār and Nagaraṭṭār denominated the shrine…and took upon themselves the responsibility of maintaining the temple and protecting its property. As remuneration, one Veli (6.5 acres) of land was assigned to each member of the Vēlaikkāras.

The contract was ratified by the Vēlaikkāras in the following words:

We protect the villages belonging to the temple, its servants' property and devotees, EVEN THOUGH, IN DOING THIS, WE LOSE OURSELVES OR OTHERWISE SUFFER. We provide for all the requirements of the temple so long as our community continues to exist, repairing such parts of the temple as get dilapidated in course of time and we get this, our contract, which is attested by us, engraved on stone and copper so that it may last as long as the Moon and the Sun endure.

Capitalisation Added

Outwardly, this is a commercial contract but the wordings clearly elicit awe, wonder, admiration and sublimity within us. It also opens a beautiful casket revealing the nuances of the guild system and the society that housed it. The inscription also gives a full list of the subgroups within the Vēlaikkāra community. Some notable groups include the Vaḷaṅgai, Iḍaṅgai, Śīrudanaṁ, piḷḷaigaḷ-danaṁ, vaḍugar, malaiyāḷar, and parivārakkoṇḍam. The aforementioned Vaḷḷan̄jiyār and Nagaraṭṭār communities were—and remain—ubiquitous throughout South India all the way up to our own time. For example, the Kannada equivalent of Vaḷḷan̄jiyār is Ban̄ajiga, and Nagaraṭṭār equates to Nagartaru; the renowned annual Bangalore Karaga begins its journey from the Dharmarayaswamy Temple situated in the Nagartapete, a locality named after Nagartaru.

Unarguably, the awesome history of our corporate guilds has been preserved till this day through these surnames or family names. And so, theory masters “researching” the “caste system” of India are clearly emitting hot, noxious fumes from unmentionable body parts.

Courtesy: https://www.dharmadispatch.in/history/the-daring-saga-of-the-kshatriya-%C5%9Br%C4%93%E1%B9%87is

Legal and Judicial Aspects of Guilds and Corporations in Ancient India - Sandeep Balakrishna

 

Legal and Judicial Aspects of Guilds and Corporations

AS OUR GUILDS AND CORPORATIONS extended the ambit of their operations and swelled in influence, the society and legal system too, kept pace with them. The Dharmasastra literature over time, evolved to meet these changing circumstances. It contains copious rules relating to guilds, corporations, caravans and trading communities.

The prime feature of this politico-legal facet was the right of corporations to have their own rules, regulations and laws, which the Government not only recognized but the King was bound to consult them before taking any decision that impacted corporate bodies. In fact, as early as the fifth century BCE, this system had already been formalized. Here’s a verse from the Gautama Dharma-Sutra:

Cultivators, traders, herdsmen, money-lenders and artisans are authorized to lay down rules for their respective classes, and the king shall give the legal decision after having learned the (state of) affairs from those who have authority to speak on behalf of each class or guild.

Internally, guilds and corporations functioned strictly along democratic principles. The Buddhist period for example, furnishes us with extensive evidence for this fact.

A General Assembly—akin to modern-day board meetings—was vested with supreme authority to decide on all matters. The actual procedure for conducting these meetings was described down to the last detail. All members of the guild had a right to vote unless they were incapacitated in some way. No meeting was legal unless all the members entitled to vote were present. If a member was absent for some reason, he could formally declare his consent to vote, familiar in contemporary terminology as absentee voting. The formal consent of absentee members was known as Chhanda. The Mahavagga for example, contains elaborate rules formulated to constitute a quorum.

While the king did grant extraordinary autonomy to guilds and corporations, it was not a blanket licence. He was the supreme judge invested with juridical and punitive powers in both cases: (1) where disputes could not be internally settled by corporate bodies (2) disputes between different corporate bodies. The unfairly reviled Manusmriti has a stately description about how the king should conduct such judicial proceedings:

He was to enter the court preserving a dignified demeanour, together with the Brahmanas learned in the Vedas, and with experienced councilors. He was to examine the cases either seated or standing but without ostentation in his dress and ornaments. The decision had to be pronounced in a timely fashion… The laws of various Jatis, of districts, of guilds, and of families had to be studied by the king, who was to adjudicate based on the peculiar law of every one of them.

Apart from the King, there were Executive Courts specifically meant for trying cases related to corporate bodies. These were helmed by three Commissioners (Pradēṣṭārāh) or three ministers (Amātyāh). Here is a brief list of the corporate or quasi-corporate entities they dealt with: guilds (Śrēṇi), artisans (Kārukāh), weavers (tantuvāyāha), washermen (rajakāh), goldsmiths (Suvarṇakārāh), sweepers and scavengers (jjhārakapānśudhāvākaḥ), physicians (bhiṣajah), traders (vanik), musicians (kuśīlavā), dancers (cārāṇāvāha), mendicants (bhikṣukaḥ), and cheats (kuhakāha). These courts in turn were divided into two: Dharmastha and kaṇṭakaśōdhana. The former dealt with cases of contract and tort while the latter tried cases involving oppression of the people inflicted by corporate bodies. The ubiquitous corporate villain and capitalist monster is a staple fare in contemporary Tamil and Telugu cinema. Perhaps these creativity-deprived storytellers might find some good material if they care to study the legal and judicial aspects of corporate and business life in ancient and medieval India.

Tradition, custom and usage of each guild or business community played the most decisive role in two major areas:

1. While adjudicating disputes.

2. When the Government allowed the starting or expansion of a new business or commercial project, while levying specific classes of taxes, etc.

The primacy of guild-specific traditions, usages and customs throughout the commercial history of India has to be mandatorily grasped in order to derive a well-rounded and accurate understanding of the subject.

We have an incredible proviso in the Sukraniti related to guilds of thieves, among others.This is how it reads:

The cultivators, the artisans, the artists, the usurers, corporations, the dancers, the ascetics and thieves should decide their disputes according to the usage of their guild, etc. It is impossible to detect them through others’ help. So, they are to be found out with the help of persons born in those guilds.

See how this injunction neatly ties in with Manusmriti’s dictum that the king should be well-versed in the traditions, laws, usages and customs of each guild? The aforementioned guilds of thieves also indicate the same civilizational and social continuity: for example, the much-maligned Kallar tribe had existed in an unbroken manner till the end of the 19th century.

The remarkable endurance of this system can also be seen in the reign of the Hoysala monarch Vira Somesvara (1235 – 1263 CE). His senior minister Rama Deva Nayaka issued a charter to the Acharyas of several merchant guilds of Gommatapura (Shravanabelagola). An Acharya was the titular name given to the head of a guild. This is the text of this rather extraordinary charter:

In case the imposts classed as nyaya, anyaya and mala-braya of the palace come to be levied, the acharya…shall himself pay and settle the matter: it is no concern of the residents. Those who violate the terms of this charter are the destroyers of the Dharma-sthala [i.e., Shravanabelagola renowned as a sacred pilgrimage site]. If among the merchants of this holy place one or two, posing as leaders, teach the acharya deceit, and, causing confusion by taking one thing for another, encourage him to covet a hāga [a quarter of something including a monetary unit] and a bēḷe [half of something including a monetary unit] and still ask for more, they are traitors to the creed, traitors to the king, enemies of the [guild]… If knowing this, merchants are indifferent, they alone are destroyers of this charity and not the acharya. If without the consent of the merchants, one or two leaders enter into the acharya’s house or the palace, they are traitors to the creed. WITH REGARD TO PRIVILEGES, FORMER USAGE SHALL BE FOLLOWED.

We suppose the whole thing is self-explanatory but the concluding sentence reveals the same thing once again: the nearly paranoid care of preserving tradition. It is also rather delightful: “former usage” can range anywhere dating back to a few generations all the way up to the Vedic era. Every such charter, document, inscription and epigraph found in any Hindu historical period throughout Bharatavarsha concludes with a similar injunction. Tradition is the only, the most effective vehicle for preserving continuity, stability and order.

The literate but irredeemably ignorant “reformers” who tried to “create” a “new India” in 1947 tried to do so not only by bypassing but axing the very roots of tradition.

IN PASSING, IT IS PERTINENT to mention another important feature of Corporate India in ancient times. One of the mantras in the contemporary world, especially over the last two decades is something called ease of doing business. As we are all aware, there are elaborate systems for ranking a country based on this parameter. However, our policymakers would be greatly rewarded if they study these aspects of the business and corporate life in ancient India. Much invaluable lessons and learnings are lying in wait. In fact, the story of the gradual and organic evolution of our guilds into massive, transnational corporations is not only rewarding in the worldly sense but is a delightful study of a magnificent, kaleidoscopic universe in itself.

Unfortunately, constraints of space and unavailability of more comprehensive research forbid me from mentioning even the contours of this feature.

Courtesy: https://www.dharmadispatch.in/history/a-peek-into-the-legal-and-judicial-aspects-of-guilds-and-corporations-in-ancient-india